The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42520-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Attenuation Coefficient Estimation in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Cancer Treatment by Levenberg Marquardt and Gauss-Newton Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the absorption coefficient ( α ), the estimated value of 19.8007 m −1 for Case 1 and 19.8043 m −1 for Case 2 have a good agreement with the values obtained through LM (19.7876 m −1 ) and GN (19.8060 m −1 ) presented in Reference [5]. Moreover, the interval values for both cases of the present study are lower compared to the values obtained by Levenberg–Marquart and Gauss–Newton, which is due to the higher number of samples in MCMC, indicating a better performance of the method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the absorption coefficient ( α ), the estimated value of 19.8007 m −1 for Case 1 and 19.8043 m −1 for Case 2 have a good agreement with the values obtained through LM (19.7876 m −1 ) and GN (19.8060 m −1 ) presented in Reference [5]. Moreover, the interval values for both cases of the present study are lower compared to the values obtained by Levenberg–Marquart and Gauss–Newton, which is due to the higher number of samples in MCMC, indicating a better performance of the method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the interval values for both cases of the present study are lower compared to the values obtained by Levenberg–Marquart and Gauss–Newton, which is due to the higher number of samples in MCMC, indicating a better performance of the method. It is important to mention that in, 5 a single parameter is estimated considering the remaining parameters as constants. In References [6, 7] the absorption coefficient and the perfusion rate were estimated and then used to calculate the thermal diffusivity, thus performing an independent process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations