2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.09.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of areal and profile surface measurement methods for evaluating surface properties of machined components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. [12] it was found that h rms and h a as obtained from 1D stylus measurements and 2D optical measurements where nearly the same as expected from theory as they are averages involving all the measured height data points. On the other hand the extreme value-forming parameters h z and h 1z vary greatly and should not be used for design purposes.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ref. [12] it was found that h rms and h a as obtained from 1D stylus measurements and 2D optical measurements where nearly the same as expected from theory as they are averages involving all the measured height data points. On the other hand the extreme value-forming parameters h z and h 1z vary greatly and should not be used for design purposes.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…In another study (see Ref. [12]) h z h 1z was in the range 1.67-2.10 for a milled steel surface, 1.73-1.80 for a polymer surface produced by a sintering process, and 1.63- 1.69 for the surface of a saw spruce wood block. These values are very similar to what we found above where on the average h z h 1z is in the range ≈ 1.5 − 2 depending on the width of the roll-off region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several recent reports deal with examinations on optical measurements [59], mainly with diffractive relief structures [60] as well as with interference microscopy [61] and confocal and spiral scanning [62], factoring in the comparative papers on various technologies [63]. Some researchers have also discussed the comparability of the surface parameters resulting from the profile and the areal measurements [64,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most recent reports cover investigations on optical measurement [28], especially diffractive relief structures [29] and interference microscopy [30] with confocal and spiral scanning [31], including comparative studies of different techniques [32]. Some researchers also discuss the comparability of different surface parameters obtained from profile and areal measurements [33,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%