Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry

Günay, Ayşe; Çelenk, Sema; Adıgüzel, Özkan; Cangül, Suzan; Özcan, Nida; Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu

doi:10.12659/msm.939065

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Silver-reinforced GIC includes the incorporation of silver particles into the glass ionomer matrix. [ 8 , 9 ] Result of resent In-vitro study showed a significantly higher CS and DTS of the S-GIC over the C-GIC underscores a critical advancement in dental material technology. The addition of silver particles is intended to increase the compressive and tensile strength of the cement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Upon the introduction of novel materials, it is imperative to possess a comprehensive understanding of their physical and mechanical properties, as well as to conduct clinical evaluations, prior to their adoption in clinical settings. [ 9 ] The compressive strength test and the diametral tensile strength test emerge as the predominant methodologies for evaluating the mechanical characteristics of the newly introduced cements. Therefore, it is of interest to conduct a comparative analysis and evaluation of the CS and DTS between a traditional Glass Ionomer Cement and a Silver-reinforced GIC.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement

Sharma,

Bagchi,

Mullick

et al. 2024

Bioinformation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Australia) were fabricated for the evaluation of compressive strength, and an identical number of samples were created for the examination of tensile strength. These specimens were then tested using a universal testing apparatus. The results exhibited that both the compressive and diametral tensile strengths were significantly greater for the S-GIC cement in comparison to the C-GIC, with a notable p-value of 0.001. The findings suggest that S-GIC may be considered a viable alternative to conventional GIC.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement

Sharma,

Bagchi,

Mullick

et al. 2024

Bioinformation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) were developed to improve the physical and mechanical properties of GICs [16]. These materials undergo a dual-setting reaction, the typical acid-base reaction of GICs, and photopolymerization [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage of Glass Ionomers as Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies

Alsari,

Ghilotti,

Sanz

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to perform a qualitative synthesis of the available in vitro evidence on the microleakage of commercially available conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs), resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs), and modified glass ionomer cements with nano-fillers, zirconia, or bioactive glasses. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement standards. The literature search was performed in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify relevant articles. Laboratory studies that evaluated microleakage of GICs, RMGICs, and modified glass ionomer cements with nano-fillers, zirconia, or bioactive glasses were eligible for inclusion. The QUIN risk of bias tool for the assessment of in vitro studies conducted in dentistry was used. After the study selection process, which included duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text assessment, 15 studies were included. A qualitative synthesis of the evidence is presented, including author data, year of publication, glass ionomer materials used, sample characteristics, microleakage technique and values, and main outcome measures for primary and permanent teeth. Although no statistically significant differences were found in numerous studies, most results showed that RMGICs exhibited less leakage than conventional GICs. All studies agreed that leakage was significantly higher at dentin margins. It was also higher at the gingival margin than at the occlusal margin. Nano-filled RMGICs Ketac N100, Equia Forte, and Zirconomer appear to have less microleakage than conventional GICs and RMGICs. Further investigations using a standardized procedure are needed to confirm the results.

show abstract

“…Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) were developed to improve the physical and mechanical properties of GICs [ 21 ]. The most common resin monomer is 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), to which a photoinitiator, such as camphoroquinone, is added to allow a light-mediated setting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remineralizing Ability of Resin Modified Glass Ionomers (RMGICs): A Systematic Review

Ghilotti,

Mayorga,

Sanz

et al. 2023

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selective caries removal approach leads to the need to use materials with the ability to remineralize remaining partially demineralized dentin. Among the materials proposed are resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate, based on in vitro experimental studies, whether RMGICs are suitable for remineralizing affected dentin. A systematic literature search was performed in four databases, followed by article selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Studies assessing the remineralizing potential of RMGICs on dentin were included in our review. Studies which compared such properties between different RMGICs or with other materials were also eligible. The studies report the remineralizing ability of RMGICs, albeit with differences between different commercial products. RMGICs show a similar ability to conventional GICs to remineralize affected dentin, fulfilling the function for which they are designed. Moreover, the incorporation of additives, such as bioactive glass (BAG) or CCP-ACP, improves their remineralizing potential. The results of this review support the use of RMGICs as restorative materials after selective caries removal.

show abstract

Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry

Cited by 6 publications

References 35 publications

Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement

Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement

Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage of Glass Ionomers as Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies

Remineralizing Ability of Resin Modified Glass Ionomers (RMGICs): A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About