2017
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1306101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of anti-pertussis toxin ELISA and agglutination assays to assess immune responses to pertussis

Abstract: Based on the obtained results and the results of other authors, we summarize that anti-PT ELISA should be carefully used to assess the population immunity to pertussis. Currently, there is neither a serological test that accurately determines the protection against pertussis nor a distinctive criterion of protection that can be applied in seroepidemiological studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data show that immunogenicity levels, reported as mean GMT, were low right before the fourth (first booster) with all studies reporting levels below 11 EU/mL 33,37,39 , with three reporting values reaching above 40 EU/mL one month after the fourth-dose studies 29,33 (Figure 2). Similarly, low levels of GMT were reported prior to the fifth dose 34,[37][38][39] , with the single study evaluating pre and post-fifth dose reporting levels of 8.4 EU/mL prior, and 30.2 EU/mL 30 days post booster 34 .…”
Section: Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The data show that immunogenicity levels, reported as mean GMT, were low right before the fourth (first booster) with all studies reporting levels below 11 EU/mL 33,37,39 , with three reporting values reaching above 40 EU/mL one month after the fourth-dose studies 29,33 (Figure 2). Similarly, low levels of GMT were reported prior to the fifth dose 34,[37][38][39] , with the single study evaluating pre and post-fifth dose reporting levels of 8.4 EU/mL prior, and 30.2 EU/mL 30 days post booster 34 .…”
Section: Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All the RCTs and uncontrolled prospective cohort studies had short follow-up periods 28,29,[32][33][34] , with a maximum of six weeks post-completion of the primary schedule (third wP dose). Five 30,31,[37][38][39] cross-sectional studies included children of older ages (six years of age and older), and only one of these 39 evaluated children of 72 months of age who received a second booster dose (Table 3).…”
Section: Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations