1993
DOI: 10.1159/000462354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Anti-Human and Anti-Porcine Factor VIII Inhibitor Levels in 63 Patients with Severe Haemophilia A

Abstract: The levels of anti-human and anti-porcine factor VIII inhibitors, measured in 63 severe haemophilia A patients, lay in the ranges of <0.2-2,600 and <0.2-1,300 Bethesda units per ml (BU/ml), respectively, with a median cross-reactivity of 33%. In 4 patients, human and porcine inhibitor levels were determined using both plasma, either human or porcine, and factor VIII concentrate, either very high purity human or porcine (Hyate:C®). A good correlation between titres was found, whatever the source of factor VIII … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a laboratory artefact caused by depletion of factor VIII in the substrate plasma, which may be ‘diluted out’ so that assays of increasing dilutions of the patient's plasma give progressively increasing factor IX, XI and XII levels while having no effect on the uniformly low factor VIII level. The inhibitor titre should be determined using both human and porcine factor VIII because factor VIII auto‐antibodies usually exhibit little inhibitor activity against porcine factor VIII (Kasper, 1991; Fiks‐Sigaud et al , 1993; Morrison et al , 1993). The Bethesda assay may underestimate inhibitor potency in acquired haemophilia because the second‐order reaction kinetics result in the persistence of low levels of factor VIII, even after prolonged incubation.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Investigation Of Inhibitors To Factors VIII Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a laboratory artefact caused by depletion of factor VIII in the substrate plasma, which may be ‘diluted out’ so that assays of increasing dilutions of the patient's plasma give progressively increasing factor IX, XI and XII levels while having no effect on the uniformly low factor VIII level. The inhibitor titre should be determined using both human and porcine factor VIII because factor VIII auto‐antibodies usually exhibit little inhibitor activity against porcine factor VIII (Kasper, 1991; Fiks‐Sigaud et al , 1993; Morrison et al , 1993). The Bethesda assay may underestimate inhibitor potency in acquired haemophilia because the second‐order reaction kinetics result in the persistence of low levels of factor VIII, even after prolonged incubation.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Investigation Of Inhibitors To Factors VIII Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors) to factor (F) VIII typically exhibit incomplete or absent crossreactivity with porcine FVIII [1–4]. A commercial plasma‐derived porcine FVIII concentrate (Hyate:C; Ipsen Inc., Milford, MA, USA) was effective for 20 years in the management of many inhibitor patients [5–10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with a low inhibitor level of FVIII or FIX, below 10 Bethesda Units (BU) per millilitre of plasma, and especially those with a low anamnestic response, can be given high doses of the coagulation factor concentrate to neutralize the inhibitor and induce immune tolerance (11). Porcine FVIII is an alternative treatment for haemophilia A patients with inhibitors to FVIII as about 25% of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A do not cross-react with porcine FVIII (12). However, many patients who do not initially have antibodies that cross-react with porcine FVIII eventually develop such antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%