2017
DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of animal, action and phonemic fluency in aphasia

Abstract: Verbal fluency, particularly animal fluency, is sensitive to even mild aphasia. PWA produced lexically simpler responses than their neurotypical peers. This study identifies the relevance of qualitative analysis of verbal fluency responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is well-established that verb, semantic, and phonemic fluency tasks draw on different cognitive entities and anatomical neuronal substrates (Henry et al, 2004;Östberg et al, 2007;Stokholm et al, 2013;Clark et al, 2014;Faroqi-Shah and Milman, 2018;Gordon et al, 2018). For instance, verb fluency is known to engage syntactic processing as many verbs necessitate activation of argument structures related to thematic roles (Pekkala, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is well-established that verb, semantic, and phonemic fluency tasks draw on different cognitive entities and anatomical neuronal substrates (Henry et al, 2004;Östberg et al, 2007;Stokholm et al, 2013;Clark et al, 2014;Faroqi-Shah and Milman, 2018;Gordon et al, 2018). For instance, verb fluency is known to engage syntactic processing as many verbs necessitate activation of argument structures related to thematic roles (Pekkala, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased production of more highly frequent alternatives can be taken as an index of lexical simplification of language (Paetzold and Specia, 2017 ). A similar shift towards high-frequency words is commonly observed in language produced by individuals suffering from dementia (Thompson-Schill et al, 1999 ; Bird et al, 2000 ; Silveri et al, 2002 ; Sailor et al, 2004 ; Forbes-McKay et al, 2005 ) or in speech patterns of aphasic patients (Howard et al, 1984 ; Nickels and Howard, 1994 , 1995 ; Cuetos et al, 2002 ; Boukrina et al, 2015 ; Faroqi-Shah and Milman, 2018 ). In cases of thalamic aphasia, such substitution of words with semantically related and highly frequent alternatives has been linked with the development of semantic paraphasias and jargon (Crosson, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lexical frequency effects may originate throughout this incremental process, beginning with the interface between the semantic (preverbal) and the lexical stage levels, with an emphasis, however, on phonological word form encoding (Jescheniak and Levelt, 1994 ; Navarrete et al, 2006 ; Kittredge et al, 2008 ; Knobel et al, 2008 ). In a clinical context, increased use of highly frequent words and difficulties in the production and recognition of infrequent words are found in aphasic conditions and dementia (Nickels and Howard, 1994 , 1995 ; Bird et al, 2000 ; Sailor et al, 2004 ; Schwartz et al, 2004 ; Vita et al, 2014 ; Boukrina et al, 2015 ; Kavé and Goral, 2016 ; Faroqi-Shah and Milman, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We strive to address these unresolved issues (discussed below) and seek to fill the gaps to determine the relative contribution of lexical and executive control processes during verbal fluency performance in aphasia. The above‐mentioned studies in aphasia, with the exception of Faroqi‐Shah and Milman (2018), have mostly investigated semantic fluency, whereas letter fluency remains underexplored in monolingual aphasia population. Our understanding of verbal fluency in monolingual aphasia will benefit from a systematic comparison of semantic and letter fluency.…”
Section: The Current Investigation Research Questions and Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%