2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of analysis methods for wind-driven cross ventilation through large openings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case without louvers was also performed. In the previous research (Gautam et al 2019) of the simplified model with the orifice equation, the perpendicular approaching airflow towards openings can cause the largest deviation. To evaluate the quality of the simplified model for predicting cross-ventilation capacity in the worst condition, the perpendicular approaching airflow was applied to perform CFD simulations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cross Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The case without louvers was also performed. In the previous research (Gautam et al 2019) of the simplified model with the orifice equation, the perpendicular approaching airflow towards openings can cause the largest deviation. To evaluate the quality of the simplified model for predicting cross-ventilation capacity in the worst condition, the perpendicular approaching airflow was applied to perform CFD simulations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cross Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on a mass balance of the airflow within the cross-ventilation building, the ventilation rate Q is calculated by integrating the normal velocity at all openings on building facades (Jiang and Chen 2001;Gautam et al 2019), as shown in Equation (4).…”
Section: Coupled Indoor and Outdoor Airflow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although wind tunnel simulations can objectively and realistically observe the details of changes of air flowing through the observation object, their high experimental costs, limited simulation range, and physical model accuracy requirements limit the popularity of this method. e CFD method is suitable for small-scale, high-resolution fluid simulations [27][28][29]. CFD is often used for industrial component design, building structure design, urban planning environment prediction, pollutant diffusion simulation, and the like.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-ventilation, as a most common form of natural ventilation, is known to be directly linked to the urban ventilation, wind distribution around buildings, and building arrangements (Aflaki et al, 2015;Gautam et al, 2019;Kotani et al, 2009). Cross-ventilation can be an effective method for improving the building energy saving (Abdullah and Wang, 2012;Guo et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016;Mochida et al, 2006Mochida et al, , 2005 and indoor thermal comfort (Hesaraki et al, 2015;Mochida et al, 2005;Prakash and Ravikumar, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%