Comparison of an Ion-Trap and a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer using Diazepam as a Model Compound

Abstract

Recent innovations in mass spectrometry (MS) have led to the development of instruments with increased capabilities, smaller footprints, and relatively low cost. The traditional MS in most toxicology laboratories is a quadrupole system equipped with electron impact ionization. Recently, an ion trap with electron impact, positive chemical ionization, negative chemical ionization, and tandem MS capabilities was introduced by Finnigan MAT. This paper compares the sensitivity and precision of ion-ratio measurements between a Finnigan GCQ ion-trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) and a Hewlett Packard quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) using electron impact ionization with diazepam as the model compound. Additionally, the sensitivity and precision of ion ratio measurements are evaluated for the ITMS using positive chemical ionization, negative chemical ionization and tandem MS modes of analysis. In the full scan mode (m/z 50-650, 1 Hz), the ITMS had an average signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 1400 for a 2-ng injection of diazepam (10 injections per day for 5 days), within-run ion ratio precision had coefficients of variation from 5 to 11%. Using similar full scan conditions, a 10-ng injection of diazepam on the QMS had an average S/N ratio of 160, and precision of ion ratio measurements varied from 5 to 13%. In the selected ion mode (SIM) of analysis (three ions, 2 Hz), the ITMS had an average S/N of 14,000 for a 2-ng injection and ion-ratio precision ranging from 6 to 15%. Using similar SIM conditions, a 2-ng injection in the QMS had an average S/N of 3000 with ion ratio standard deviations of 0.67 to 2.9%. Overall, the ITMS provided at greater S/N, equivalent precision in full scan, but was 5- to 10-fold less precise in measuring ion ratios in the SIM mode as compared with the QMS.

Low-Pressure Chemical Ionization in Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry

“…Anyway, for a given compound and whatever the reagent, EI is more sensitive than CI, in most cases, when analyses are performed in the full scan mode. 9,24,25 In "single storage" and "tandem" experiments, detection thresholds are often of the same order of magnitude for EI and CI; CI is often preferred for the analysis of matrix extracts because it allows discrimination against some low-basicity compounds of the sample matrix. 26 There are a few papers where the comparison between EI and CI is notably in favor of CI in terms of sensitivity.…”

Factors determining the performance of triple quadrupole, quadrupole ion trap and sector field mass spectrometers in electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of oligonucleotides. 1. Comparison of performance characteristics

“…Although literature reports that compare the suitability of different mass spectrometers for quantitative detection 25,26 are found for diazepines 27,28 or proteins, 29 no data is available for oligonucleotides. The dependence of signal intensity on analyte concentration was measured using (dT) 8 and (dT) 24 .…”

Evaluation of detection methods for the reversed‐phase HPLC determination of 3′,4′,5′‐trimethoxyflavone in different phytopharmaceutical products and in human serum

“…These values are not significantly different and render ESI-and APCI-MS the most suitable detection methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis because of their high selectivity and sensitivity. It should be mentioned, however, that higher sensitivity, precision and reproducibility could be achieved using a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Fitzgerald et al, 1997).…”