2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-007-0329-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of an automated Borrelia indirect chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) with a VlsE/C6 ELISA and Immunoblot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, our protocol recognized as positive only those serum samples positive by ELISA and Western blotting and two serum samples from subjects with early symptoms that give borderline reactions in serological tests. This result confirms the poor reliability of serological tests in early Borrelia infections (Riesbeck & Hammas, 2007). Moreover, the protocol we have described allowed us to identify at species level Borrelia DNA in human serum samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, our protocol recognized as positive only those serum samples positive by ELISA and Western blotting and two serum samples from subjects with early symptoms that give borderline reactions in serological tests. This result confirms the poor reliability of serological tests in early Borrelia infections (Riesbeck & Hammas, 2007). Moreover, the protocol we have described allowed us to identify at species level Borrelia DNA in human serum samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our data also demonstrate noticeable differences of serum titers between ELISA and the CLIA assays used. These findings are in line with other studies on ELISA and CLIA assays showing that these assays have discrepancies in quantitative measurement but sound overall analytical agreement [10][11][12]. Moreover, recent data also suggest that even titers of different quantitative ELISA assays cannot be compared without further consideration [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nevertheless, the flagellar antigen had higher specificity in this endemic population in analysis of the single first sample. Concerning the C6 assay, a high rate of seropositivity in both blood donors and consecutive routine specimens has been reported previously (13,29). The flagellar IgG assay and the C6 assays were chosen because they were routinely used by the laboratories in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The C6 assay does not distinguish between IgG and IgM antibodies. Both assays have been described in previous publications from Scandinavian studies (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The C6 assay was implemented on a Bio-Rad Coda microplate processor, and the IDEIA ELISA was performed manually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%