1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb01623.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of an age adjusted warfarin loading protocol with empirical dosing and Fennerty's protocol

Abstract: Adjustment of warfarin loading doses for age exhibits clear superiority over the use of Fenn or Emp. This becomes increasingly important as the average age of patients being warfarinised increases, with the recognition that atrial fibrillation requires anticoagulation. Fenn consistently overdosed elderly patients, especially those aged 80 years and older.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some studies recommend that loading dose should be age adjusted because of concern about warfarin sensitivity. 34 However, we did not observe a disproportional number of elderly patients with excessive anticoagulation with our loading dose regimen, in which some elderly patients were indeed loaded with 10 mg as per genotype. Thus, the present data do not support age-modified loading doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, some studies recommend that loading dose should be age adjusted because of concern about warfarin sensitivity. 34 However, we did not observe a disproportional number of elderly patients with excessive anticoagulation with our loading dose regimen, in which some elderly patients were indeed loaded with 10 mg as per genotype. Thus, the present data do not support age-modified loading doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1,[34][35][36] Although several of these studies have incorporated loading dose nomograms during initiation, most have been in the setting of VTE, 19,20 and few studies incorporating loading dose strategies for other indications have been reported. 34,37 Pharmacogenomic studies conducted in the last decade have established the contribution of both VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genetic variations to maintenance dose requirements; however, VKORC1 is a more important modulator of early warfarin response than CYP2C9. 24 Not surprisingly, both genes have recently been reported to predict therapeutic doses during the initial weeks of therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to decrease the toxicity of warfarin induction, several dosing algorithms have been proposed, [14][15][16][17][18][19] but none has been widely accepted. A major barrier to their implementation is that most were developed for middleaged inpatients who could tolerate doses of 5-10 mg warfarin daily and who had daily monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR).…”
Section: Current Approaches To Warfarin Induction Fail To Prevent Advmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,20,21 Because warfarin dose requirements decrease with advancing age, 22 use of existing algorithms tends to overdose this growing population. [16][17][18][19] Another problem is that the risk of overdose is increased now that most patients begin warfarin in the outpatient setting, where daily INR monitoring is not feasible (except with patient self-monitoring). The major flaw of existing warfarin algorithms is that they are empiric: they rely on trial-and-error dosing after an initial warfarin dose of 2 to 10 mg, rather than being tailored to individual genetic and clinical factors.…”
Section: Current Approaches To Warfarin Induction Fail To Prevent Advmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier efforts to develop warfarin dosing algorithms have included serial INR measurements in the first days of warfarin use to predict subsequent doses [78,79] and/or limited clinical data (such as sex only) [80]. Such approaches have not been well validated, and are not widely used [40,78,79,81]. One reason for this is that these algorithms do not incorporate other patient, environmental, or genetic factors that alter warfarin dose requirement.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Past Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%