2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of airborne LiDAR and shipboard acoustic data in complex shallow water environments: Filling in the white ribbon zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of LiDAR technology to bathymetric measurements have been used and developed for a long time (including Enabnit, 1980;Guenther, 1985;Mandlburger et al, 2015), and its reliability has been confirmed in numerous studies (Kinzel et al 2007;Peeri and Philpot, 2007;Kotilainen and Kaskela, 2017), however, devices used in riverbed morphology studies can not be used in relatively simple laboratory tests due to the considerations of measurement accuracy, as well as the size, weight and price of the device. The aforementioned factors were the reason for undertaking work on the independent construction of the device based on prefabricated elements, in which we were guided by the principle of minimizing the size and costs with the best possible reading accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of LiDAR technology to bathymetric measurements have been used and developed for a long time (including Enabnit, 1980;Guenther, 1985;Mandlburger et al, 2015), and its reliability has been confirmed in numerous studies (Kinzel et al 2007;Peeri and Philpot, 2007;Kotilainen and Kaskela, 2017), however, devices used in riverbed morphology studies can not be used in relatively simple laboratory tests due to the considerations of measurement accuracy, as well as the size, weight and price of the device. The aforementioned factors were the reason for undertaking work on the independent construction of the device based on prefabricated elements, in which we were guided by the principle of minimizing the size and costs with the best possible reading accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In areas with high local seabed heterogeneity (i.e., geodiversity) broad scale data does not capture true diversity of the seafloor and some important features might not appear [28]. In the northern Baltic Sea, for example, large areas of seabed are marked by De Geer moraines that create a unique washboard-like seabed terrain with corresponding sediment and topographical variability [29]. These are not represented in the EMODnet maps.…”
Section: Harmonisation Process and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They commonly appear as unmapped patches forming what is known as the "white ribbon". The cost of surveying these areas is high, owing to the transient (e.g., shoals) and irregular (e.g., submerged rocks) nature of bathymetric features [29]. The lack of seabed substrate data for such areas is problematic especially because coastal areas are subject to extensive human activities (e.g., shipping, dredging, dumping, wind farm construction and aquaculture).…”
Section: European Seabed Substrate Data Coverage and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Working within the intertidal zone has always been a challenge for maritime archaeologists for both excavation and remote sensing survey. While sonar techniques have been the mainstay of marine remote sensing survey and aerial lidar or image-based techniques have been foremost terrestrially, the difficulty of applying remote sensing techniques to the shallow and intertidal zone resulted in the so-called 'white ribbon', a zone extending from the minimum depths for sonar and geophysical survey up to the coastline (Kotilainen and Kaskela 2017). The recent rise in sophisticated photogrammetry algorithms, commonly available software, combined with the increase in computer processing power have had a strong impact on coastal and shallow water archaeology (e.g.…”
Section: Technical Challenges: Shallow Water and Intertidal Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%