2003
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2003.812908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of airborne hyperspectral data and eo-1 hyperion for mineral mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
289
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 635 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
289
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations to Hyperion data use include relatively low signal-to-noise ratios of approximately 50:1, compared with 500:1 for airborne hyperspectral imaging (Pearlman et al, 2003;Kruse et al, 2003) and atmospheric interference. Quantitative VNIR-SWIR mineral differentiation via Hyperion requires atmospheric correction as seen in the Lhotse Shar ice planetary reflectance spectral signature with prominent atmospheric effects, despite the removal of broad water vapor, oxygen and carbon dioxide absorption features (Fig.…”
Section: Hyperspectral Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations to Hyperion data use include relatively low signal-to-noise ratios of approximately 50:1, compared with 500:1 for airborne hyperspectral imaging (Pearlman et al, 2003;Kruse et al, 2003) and atmospheric interference. Quantitative VNIR-SWIR mineral differentiation via Hyperion requires atmospheric correction as seen in the Lhotse Shar ice planetary reflectance spectral signature with prominent atmospheric effects, despite the removal of broad water vapor, oxygen and carbon dioxide absorption features (Fig.…”
Section: Hyperspectral Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuprite, NV, USA, located approximately 200 km northwest of Las Vegas, is well understood mineralogically [5,36,37] and has been used as a geological remote sensing test site since the early 1980s [36,[38][39][40][41]. Among the 18 minerals presented in this area, three of them (Alunite, Chalcedony, and Kaolinite) are selected because their outcrops can be spatially and spectrally clearly identified with both high SNR AVIRIS and low SNR Hyperion HSI data simultaneously.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [4] uses a knowledge-based expert system to produce mineral maps from AVIRIS HSI data. Kruse et al [5] compare Hyperion HSI data with airborne AVIRIS HSI data to show that Hyperion HSI data provides the ability to remotely map basic surface mineralogy. The relevance of having HSIs with a low level of noise or, equivalently, with a high signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), to improve the accuracy of mineral prediction, food spectroscopy, and of various tasks such as classification and retrieving supported by spectral libraries has been pointed out, for example, in [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high-resolution spectral and spatial data from Hyperion yield repeatable images of high quality, which may allow accurate mineral mapping at a large scale. Excluding those hyperspectral bands that are uncalibrated or disturbed by vapor, there are 196 unique channels for the visible and near-infrared (VNIR) bands and 77-224 for the short-wave infrared (SWIR) bands) available from Hyperion [71][72][73]. Thus, the Hyperion hyperspectral bands covering 426-926 nm (bands 8-57) and 1942-2385 nm (bands 179-223) match the wavelengths of iron oxides and hydroxides within the domains of 400-900 nm and 1900-2400 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%