2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of airborne and terrestrial gamma spectrometry measurements - evaluation of three areas in southern Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a stationary measurement, at a height of 60 m, 90% of the airborne response will be provided across a circle of radius 160 to 180 m (Kock and Samuelsson, 2011). In practice, for a moving measurement, the footprint will be elliptical and the 90% contribution area would cover 109,000 m 2 (Billings and Hovgaard, 1999).…”
Section: Airborne Radiometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a stationary measurement, at a height of 60 m, 90% of the airborne response will be provided across a circle of radius 160 to 180 m (Kock and Samuelsson, 2011). In practice, for a moving measurement, the footprint will be elliptical and the 90% contribution area would cover 109,000 m 2 (Billings and Hovgaard, 1999).…”
Section: Airborne Radiometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a stationary measurement, at a height of 60 m, 90% of the airborne response will be provided across a circle of radius 160 to 180 m (Kock and Samuelsson, 2011). In practice, for a moving measurement, the footprint will be elliptical and the 90% contribution area would cover about 109,000 m 2 (Billings and Hovgaard, 1999).…”
Section: The Airborne Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground area or footprint, which contributes radioactivity to each 1-s measurement, was assessed by Pitkin and Duval (1980). For a stationary measurement, at a height of 60 m, 90 % of the airborne response will be provided across a circle of radius 160-180 m (Kock and Samuelsson 2011).…”
Section: Airborne Radiometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%