2010
DOI: 10.14358/pers.76.4.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Airborne and Terrestrial Lidar Estimates of Seacliff Erosion in Southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Raymond (2010) and Young et al (2010b) determined that the OLC seacliffs are composed of >50% sand content. Sediment contributions from the erosion of seacliffs may become a larger percentage of the sediment source as the effects of damming (Slagel and Griggs, 2008;Willis and Griggs, 2003) and urbanization of the coastal watershed continue to increase (Warrick and Rubin, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Raymond (2010) and Young et al (2010b) determined that the OLC seacliffs are composed of >50% sand content. Sediment contributions from the erosion of seacliffs may become a larger percentage of the sediment source as the effects of damming (Slagel and Griggs, 2008;Willis and Griggs, 2003) and urbanization of the coastal watershed continue to increase (Warrick and Rubin, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these criteria, ALS and TLS data are the most appropriate references for the analysis of the ALS data. 24 In this study, DSMs, derived from ∼50% overlapping ALS strips, were compared internally. In addition, DSMs, achieved from matched and merged ALS strips, were checked against the TLS DSMs.…”
Section: Model-based Geolocation Accuracy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lidar-based change-detection analyses (CDA), i.e., mapping landscape adjustments through time in multi-temporal ALS and TLS data sets, have provided comprehensive measurements of snow depth (e.g., Harpold et al, 2014b;Tinkham et al, 2014) and ablation (Egli et al, 2011), co-seismic displacements after earthquakes (e.g., Oskin et al, 2012;Nissen et al, 2014), changes in aeolian dune form and migration rates (e.g., Pelletier, 2013), fluvial erosion (e.g., Anderson and Pitlick, 2014;Pelletier and Orem, 2014), earthflow displacements (e.g., DeLong et al, 2011), knickpoint migration in gully/channel systems (e.g., Rengers and Tucker, 2014), cliff retreat along coasts (Young et al, 2010), permafrost degradation (Levy et al, 2013;Barnhart and Crosby, 2013), forest growth (Yu et al, 2004;Naesset and Gobakken, 2005), and changes in biomass (e.g., Meyer et al, 2013;Olsoy et al, 2014). Traditionally, lidar point clouds have been rasterized prior to differencing using open-source processing toolkits (e.g., GCD (Geomorphic Change Detection); e.g., Wheaton et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%