2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of AHP and BWM methods based on ArcGIS for ecological suitability assessment of Panax notoginseng in Yunnan Province, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research findings reveal significant similarities in the calculated criteria weights between the AHP and BWM methods, with the weights nearly equal. In contrast, studies conducted by Ajrina et al [65], Sahraei et al [66], and Tan et al [67], did not observe such pronounced similarities. Both methods consistently assign notably higher weights to the first three criteria (distance from existing hospitals, distance from main roads, distance from green spaces) and considerably lower weights to the last three criteria (distance from petrol stations, distance from residential areas, and population density).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Our research findings reveal significant similarities in the calculated criteria weights between the AHP and BWM methods, with the weights nearly equal. In contrast, studies conducted by Ajrina et al [65], Sahraei et al [66], and Tan et al [67], did not observe such pronounced similarities. Both methods consistently assign notably higher weights to the first three criteria (distance from existing hospitals, distance from main roads, distance from green spaces) and considerably lower weights to the last three criteria (distance from petrol stations, distance from residential areas, and population density).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Through pairwise comparisons, criteria are assessed in relation to each other to ascertain their relative importance. The consistency of these comparisons is checked to ensure reliability (Tan et al, 2023). Once consistency is established, weights are calculated for each criterion, representing their signi cance in the decision-making process.…”
Section: Ahp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data regarding the indicator level were normalized, and the entropy weight method [35] was employed to calculate the weights of these indicators. Then, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [36], the weights were further computed to obtain the weight vector U. The summary of the weights of the criterion layer and the indicator layer can be found in Table 2.…”
Section: Preliminary Formulation Of the Weights Of Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%