2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10133-010-0007-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Agronomic Characters, Total Seed Storage Proteins and their use for Genotypes Discrimination in the Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa PratensisL.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular analysis, in conjunction with the characteristics of morphological traits, may be used to classify plants and select the initial forms for creating new cultivars or breeding lines. In the case of P. pratensis , this was confirmed by Shortell, Meyer & Bonos (2009) , Tamkoc & Arslan (2010) , Raggi et al (2015) and Yuan et al (2015) . In this study, two markers (RAPD and ISSR) based on DNA amplification reactions were used to assess the genetic diversity of ecotypes and cultivars of P. pratensis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular analysis, in conjunction with the characteristics of morphological traits, may be used to classify plants and select the initial forms for creating new cultivars or breeding lines. In the case of P. pratensis , this was confirmed by Shortell, Meyer & Bonos (2009) , Tamkoc & Arslan (2010) , Raggi et al (2015) and Yuan et al (2015) . In this study, two markers (RAPD and ISSR) based on DNA amplification reactions were used to assess the genetic diversity of ecotypes and cultivars of P. pratensis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It should be stressed that in previous studies aimed at evaluating RAPD polymorphism in different populations of P. pratensis , such a high genetic diversity among ecotypes had never been found, while the average Dice’s coefficient was about 0.7 ( Szenejko & Rogalski, 2015 ). Other authors also reported significant genetic relatedness among the different genotypes and cultivars of P. pratensis ( Johnson et al, 2002 ; Ning et al, 2005 ; Tamkoc & Arslan, 2010 ; Fard et al, 2012 ). UPGMA dendrograms based on genetic similarity matrices revealed discrepancies in the mode of clustering of the studied forms of P. pratensis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…RAPD analyses of Poa pratensis, primarily, focused on: identification of sexual and apomictic genotypes (Huff & Bara 1993;Mazzucato et al 1995;Barcaccia et al 1997Barcaccia et al , 1998Stephens et al 2006), assessment of genetic diversity, identification of different genotypes and cultivars (Lickfeldt et al 2002;Al-Humaid & Motawei 2004;Ning et al 2005;Liang et al 2009;Fard et al 2012;Wang et al 2012), attempts to determine the genetic relationships between different genotypes and species belonging to the genus Poa (Johnson et al 2002;Curley & Jung 2004;Patterson et al 2005), and identification of pathogens responsible for fungal diseases in grasses (Hsiang et al 2000). As evidenced by the results of research presented in the literature (Johnson et al 2002;Ning et al 2005;Rajasekar et al 2005;Szenejko et al 2009;Szenejko 2013) various forms of Poa pratensis are characterized by a high level of band polymorphism, estimated to be over 80%. This was confirmed by the results of RAPD analyses presented in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular analysis, in conjunction with the characteristics of morphological traits, may be used to classify plants and select the initial forms for creating new cultivars or breeding lines. In the case of P. pratensis, this was confirmed by Shortell et al (2009), Tamkoc & Arslan (2010), Raggi et al (2015) and Yuan et al (2015). In this study two markers (RAPD and ISSR) based on DNA amplification reactions were used to assess the genetic diversity of ecotypes and cultivars of P. pratensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%