2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of age estimates from scale, opercular bone, otolith, vertebrae and dorsal fin ray in Labeo rohita (Hamilton), Catla catla (Hamilton) and Channa marulius (Hamilton)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
4
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Jhingran (1957), Natarajan and Jhingran (1963), and Kamal (1969), in C. mrigala and C. catla scales showed clear annulations. In the first published report on precision of age estimates from different aging structures of Indian freshwater fishes, it was observed that in L. rohita, C. catla, and C. marulius, among different structures (scales, otoliths, opercular bones, vertebrae, and dorsal fin rays), scales were the most suitable structure for aging L. rohita and C. marulius, and opercular bones were best for C. catla (Khan and Khan 2009). In addition to having clear and sharp annuli, scales also have the advantages of easy collection, which is non-destructive to the fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to Jhingran (1957), Natarajan and Jhingran (1963), and Kamal (1969), in C. mrigala and C. catla scales showed clear annulations. In the first published report on precision of age estimates from different aging structures of Indian freshwater fishes, it was observed that in L. rohita, C. catla, and C. marulius, among different structures (scales, otoliths, opercular bones, vertebrae, and dorsal fin rays), scales were the most suitable structure for aging L. rohita and C. marulius, and opercular bones were best for C. catla (Khan and Khan 2009). In addition to having clear and sharp annuli, scales also have the advantages of easy collection, which is non-destructive to the fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales were washed, cleaned, and studied as dry mounts after removing the extraneous matter and mucous by washing them in tap water and rubbing in between the finger tips. To make scales more clear and soft, the large scales were dipped in weak solution (1%) of KOH for about 5-10 min, and then washed in tap water and dried in air (Khan and Khan 2009). Since the scales attain a fairly large size and are translucent, they were read with the help of a magnifying glass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations