Comparison of after Veres Closed Trocar and Open Entry Methods in Terms of Efficiency, Complications and Postoperative Pain in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Prospective Study

Bozkurt, Murat

doi:10.5152/jarem.2012.25

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both studies support our study interms of direct trocar method's safety. In 2012 Bozkurt [3] and colleagues in Turkey conducted a prospective study comparing the efficiency, complication and post surgery pain between the direct trocar entry method and open entry method, and concluded that both techniques have advantages and disadvantages and stated that the surgeons should prefer the technique that they are accustomed to and have experience in. Operation technique that the surgens used to do will have been efficient for decrease complications and operations time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct Trocar Entry For Laparoscopy Safety and Efficiency

Ulusoy¹

2018

Laparosc Endosc Surg Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct Trocar Entry For Laparoscopy Safety and Efficiency

Ulusoy¹

2018

Laparosc Endosc Surg Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison of Abdominal Initial Entry Techniques in Gynecological Laparoscopy

GUNDOGDU,

USTA

2023

Journal of Contemporary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the safety of laparoscopic entry techniques. Materials and Methods: Within the scope of the study, medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopy due to various gynecological indications at our clinic between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2015, were examined. Evaluation was conducted using our hospital’s electronic database. Results: In the patient cohort, direct trocar placement was preferred in 91.8% (1025 patients), Veress needle placement was used in 7.4% (82 patients), and an open technique was used in 0.8% (9 patients). In terms of entry sites, umbilicus was the most commonly chosen option, being preferred in 97.2% (1085 patients) of cases. In 2.4% of patients (27 patients), the midline abdominal trocar was preferred as the initial trocar insertion site. Among these patients, suprapubic incision was preferred in 62% (17 patients), while Lee-Huang point was chosen as the entry site in 38% (10 patients).Looking at the history of previous surgeries, 18.5% (206 patients) had a history of prior abdominal surgery, and 3.5% (39 patients) had undergone two previous surgical procedures. Only 0.1% (1 patient) had undergone three or more abdominal surgeries. Discussion: In conclusion, no clear superiority of one initial entry technique over another has been proven. Despite the extensive literature on laparoscopic entry, debates regarding the most effective method to prevent significant complications continue.

show abstract

Comparison of after Veres Closed Trocar and Open Entry Methods in Terms of Efficiency, Complications and Postoperative Pain in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Prospective Study

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Direct Trocar Entry For Laparoscopy Safety and Efficiency

Direct Trocar Entry For Laparoscopy Safety and Efficiency

Comparison of Abdominal Initial Entry Techniques in Gynecological Laparoscopy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About