1967
DOI: 10.2514/3.28988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of aerodynamic data from the Gemini flights and AEDC-VKF wind tunnels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mid to late 1960's, hypersonic wind-tunnel tests of small scale models were performed. [1][2][3][4] The tests were performed at the Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) in the von Karman Gas Dynamics Facility (VKF) and involved a low density, hypersonic, continuous-flow, arc heated, and ejector-pumped windtunnel called VKF Tunnel L. For this report, the aerodynamics of three small scale models in these windtunnel tests is examined. First, descriptions of the computational approaches are given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mid to late 1960's, hypersonic wind-tunnel tests of small scale models were performed. [1][2][3][4] The tests were performed at the Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) in the von Karman Gas Dynamics Facility (VKF) and involved a low density, hypersonic, continuous-flow, arc heated, and ejector-pumped windtunnel called VKF Tunnel L. For this report, the aerodynamics of three small scale models in these windtunnel tests is examined. First, descriptions of the computational approaches are given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting example concerns data obtained in a low-density, hypersonic wind tunnel in the 1960s as part of the Apollo program [63][64][65][66]. A variety of very small models were tested that included cones as well as capsules such as Apollo, Gemini, and Mercury.…”
Section: A Analyses Of Hypersonic Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forebody aerodynamic drag is also computed using Newtonian flow assumptions. The numerical simulation can be validated with the post flight data of the Gemini, Apollo and Star dust flights data (Griffith, 1967;Griffith & Boylan, 1968;Lockman, 1970;& Wood, 1997).…”
Section: Newtonian Impact Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%