2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Adjuvant Therapies by an H2‐receptor Antagonist and a Proton Pump Inhibitor After Endoscopic Treatment in Hemostatic Management of Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers

Abstract: Famotidine and omeprazole injected during the early phase of a bleeding ulcer may have similar effects to an adjuvant therapy for preventing rebleeding from endoscopically treated upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Japanese patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPI (pantoprazole, omeprazole) versus i.v. H2RA (ranitidine, famotidine) after endoscopic therapy showed no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding . However, other studies have shown that PPI is superior to H2RA in reducing the rebleeding rate, the need for blood transfusion, and duration of hospitalization .…”
Section: Management Of Patients With Acute Peptic Gastroduodenal Ulcementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PPI (pantoprazole, omeprazole) versus i.v. H2RA (ranitidine, famotidine) after endoscopic therapy showed no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding . However, other studies have shown that PPI is superior to H2RA in reducing the rebleeding rate, the need for blood transfusion, and duration of hospitalization .…”
Section: Management Of Patients With Acute Peptic Gastroduodenal Ulcementioning
confidence: 94%
“…H2RA (ranitidine, famotidine) after endoscopic therapy showed no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding. [116][117][118][119] However, other studies have shown that PPI is superior to H2RA in reducing the rebleeding rate, the need for blood transfusion, and duration of hospitalization. 120,121 Different hemostatic methods or different dose of PPI may have affected the different outcomes.…”
Section: Management After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been no significant difference in efficacy after endoscopic treatment for hemorrhagic peptic ulcers between intravenous PPI and H 2 RA therapy in Japan [14]. The reasons for this difference between foreign counties and Japan were thought to be as follows: (1) PPIs are usually administered in foreign countries at twice the dose as in Japan; and (2) endoscopic hemostatic techniques are better in Japan than in foreign countries.…”
Section: Non-endoscopic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%