2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-013-0204-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of adaptive structural damage identification techniques in nonlinear hysteretic vibration isolation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is particularly important in work focused on the use of elastic materials with nonlinear characteristics. Numerous vibration-isolating materials, such as polymers, are characterised by nonlinearity, which significantly hinders the setting of parameters for the model [57][58][59][60]. Moreover, there are methods that indirectly measure material parameters, e.g., Young's modulus can be obtained through the evaluation of material hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is particularly important in work focused on the use of elastic materials with nonlinear characteristics. Numerous vibration-isolating materials, such as polymers, are characterised by nonlinearity, which significantly hinders the setting of parameters for the model [57][58][59][60]. Moreover, there are methods that indirectly measure material parameters, e.g., Young's modulus can be obtained through the evaluation of material hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms rely only on the analysis of structural mechanical behavior to obtain the modal parameters of the system, such as frequency, damping ratio, mode shape, and stiffness. At present, most vibration-based SI algorithms are non-parametric (e.g., short-time Fourier transform, 11 Volterra and Wiener series representations, 12 Hilbert Huang transform, 13 blind source separation, 14 nonlinear subspace identification, 15 conjugate pair decomposition, 16 stochastic subspace identification and deterministic subspace identification, 17 independent component analysis, 18 second-order blind identification, 19 fractal dimension, 20 neural networks, 21 and Hilbert vibration decomposition 22 ). The non-parametric algorithms have no prior assumptions about structural vibration forms; a set of equations without an explicit physical meaning are used to characterize the input–output relationship of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, online joint estimation of states and hysteretic parameters of nonlinear structures is a challenging research area in the engineering field. In recent years, extensive research studies such as the methods of the extended Kalman filter (Astroza et al, 2019; Ebrahimian et al, 2015; Yang and Ma, 2003; Zhang et al, 2002), least-squares estimation (Huang et al, 2009; Mu et al, 2013; Wu et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2006, 2012; Yang and Huang, 2007), unscented Kalman filter (Al-Hussein and Haldar, 2015; Asgarieh et al, 2014; Astroza et al, 2017; Astroza and Alessandri, 2019; Wu and Smyth, 2008), ensemble Kalman filter (Ghanem and Ferro, 2006), particle filter (Chatzi and Smyth, 2009; Wan et al, 2018) have been developed. In fact, it can be said that among the proposed methods, Bayesian inference–based techniques provide a robust solution for system identification using probabilistic logic and have been widely used for engineering applications (Huang and Beck, 2018; Yuen and Mu, 2015; Yuen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%