2020 13th International Conference on Communications (COMM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/comm48946.2020.9141965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Adaptive Filtering Strategies for Self-Interference Cancellation in LTE Communication Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, the DSIC process is applied to obtain the estimated SI channel by using an adaptive filter with the Recursive Least-Squares (RLS) algorithm, and its forgetting factor should be chosen between 0.9 and 1 [ 37 ]. The RLS algorithm was chosen because it has a faster convergence and better performance in the DSIC process compared to other algorithms such as the Least Mean Squares (LMS) or Normalised Least Mean Squares (NLMS) [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. A reference signal from the transmitter side of User A can be used to cancel the SI component to obtain: …”
Section: Conventional Sb _dsiced3 _w/of Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, the DSIC process is applied to obtain the estimated SI channel by using an adaptive filter with the Recursive Least-Squares (RLS) algorithm, and its forgetting factor should be chosen between 0.9 and 1 [ 37 ]. The RLS algorithm was chosen because it has a faster convergence and better performance in the DSIC process compared to other algorithms such as the Least Mean Squares (LMS) or Normalised Least Mean Squares (NLMS) [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. A reference signal from the transmitter side of User A can be used to cancel the SI component to obtain: …”
Section: Conventional Sb _dsiced3 _w/of Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional scheme without feedback with the RLS algorithm and the SPA decoding algorithm is an optimal estimation [ 40 ] and decoding algorithm, but with a high computational complexity [ 41 ], because it requires an updated LLR sequence and decoding for each iteration. It is not suitable for short-packet FD transmission due to the high estimation error of the SI channel [ 10 ] and power consumption in IoT applications and green communications due to the high latency of the 5G QC-LDPC decoder [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Case I: Passive Eavesdroppermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After some iterations for a sufficient saturation, the channel estimates and decoded messages can be achieved with the minimum error. The channel estimation processes for both SI channel and intended channel are based on the RLS algorithm as its best performance with faster convergence compared to others [29]- [31]. It is used to monitor the change in time of the SI channel per each iteration to get a better estimation and reconstruction of the interference and intended signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%