2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/slt.2012.6424234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of adaptation methods for GMM-SVM based speech emotion recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among which, HMM is a parametric representation of time-varying features that simulate the human language processing and it needs a large number of samples for time-consuming training [7][8][9]. GMM is a probability density estimation model that can fit all probability distribution functions, but it depends heavily on data and it is sensitive to data noise [10][11][12]. SVM maps the feature vectors from input space to a high-dimensional Hilbert space by using kernel tricks at first and then seeks an optimal hyperplane in the high-dimensional space to classify samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among which, HMM is a parametric representation of time-varying features that simulate the human language processing and it needs a large number of samples for time-consuming training [7][8][9]. GMM is a probability density estimation model that can fit all probability distribution functions, but it depends heavily on data and it is sensitive to data noise [10][11][12]. SVM maps the feature vectors from input space to a high-dimensional Hilbert space by using kernel tricks at first and then seeks an optimal hyperplane in the high-dimensional space to classify samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%