Comparison of Acute Energy Expenditure and Rating of Perceived Exertion in Equivalent Bouts of Circuit Training and Treadmill Running

Abstract

Brewer, CB, Booher, BM, and Lawton, N. Comparison of acute energy expenditure and rating of perceived exertion in equivalent bouts of circuit training and treadmill running. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2018-Circuit weight training (CT) maximizes exercise density, which may lead to an inaccurate perception of energy expenditure (EE). The purpose of this study was to compare acute EE indices and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) between CT and an equivalent bout of treadmill running (TR). College-aged men (n = 9) who regularly engaged in running and resistance training performed CT first. Circuit weight training that consisted of 10 resistance stations (40% of 1 repetition maximum, 15 repetitions, 60 b·min) was performed for 20 minutes. Heart rate (HR) and EE (Cosmed K4b) were monitored continuously, and RPE was assessed consistently. A 20-min TR session was performed at the average HR maintained during CT. Dependent t-tests were used to assess differences in RPE, total EE (TEE, kcal), rate of EE (REE, kcal·min), and relative REE (RREE, kcal·kg·min) between CT and TR. Pearson's correlation was used to examine relationships between RPE and EE indices. Total EE was lower during CT (168.19 ± 16.42) than TR (244.20 ± 44.80); REE was lower during CT (8.49 ± 0.90) than TR (12.21 ± 2.24); and RREE was lower during CT (0.10 ± 0.02) than TR (0.15 ± 0.02) (all p < 0.001). Circuit weight training RPE (6.0 ± 1.1) was greater than TR (4.1 ± 0.6) (p < 0.001). There was no association between RPE and EE indices (p > 0.05). The average HR elicited by CT was 61% HR reserve. At equivalent HRs and duration, CT resulted in a significantly higher RPE but lower EE. It is imperative for participants engaged in CT to understand that although CT results in HR values within an aerobic training zone and feels more strenuous, it is not associated with greater acute EE.

The Acute Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Bodyweight and Treadmill Running High-Intensity Interval Exercises

“…Additionally, the greater recruitment of more non-oxidative muscle fibers may have resulted in subsequent accumulation of metabolites (i.e., hydrogen ions, inorganic phosphate, and lactate; Collins et al, 1991) which increases HR through the stimulation of Group III/IV afferents (Amann et al, 2015). Further, the higher RPE we observed with BW-HIIE may be indicative of sensations felt from greater localized stress on the musculoskeletal system (Ekblom and Golobarg, 1971;Pandolf and Noble, 1973;Brewer et al, 2021). These factors may have impacted the self-selected 'all-out' pace for participants during the BW-HIIE protocol.…”

The Effect of Carbohydrate Intake on Strength and Resistance Training Performance: A Systematic Review

“…Lambert and Flynn [6] estimated the glycolytic system to provide 82% of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) demand of a set of biceps curls at 80% of 1 RM to muscular failure. However, the total energy expenditure of strength training is generally lower than that of endurance-type activities [81]. One reason for the lower energy expenditure is the involvement of eccentric muscle contractions, which require relatively little energy expenditure compared to concentric muscle contractions, because they involve biomechanical rather than chemical cleaving of actin-myosin cross-bridges [82].…”

Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFit® Benchmark Workout

“…Total energy expenditure during the Isabel workout was lower than the Cindy and Fran workouts [ 11 , 20 ], but higher than those reported for strength training [ 44 ] and rowing [ 43 ]. Metabolic power reported in this study was higher compared to the Fran workout [ 11 ] and rowing [ 43 ], while caloric expenditure was lower compared to strength training [ 45 ], Cindy [ 20 ] and Fran workouts [ 11 , 13 ]. These differences could be due to intensity, volume, the number of repetitions and different types of exercises [ 33 ], and provide a framework for the prescription of training in these settings.…”