2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007760100065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of absorbable poly-l-lactide and metallic intramedullary rods in the fixation of femoral shaft osteotomies: an experimental study in rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Positioning of slices and ROIs was standardized throughout the follow-up. For the present study, five representative slices, equally spaced within the median third of the second metamer were chosen for each animal.…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Positioning of slices and ROIs was standardized throughout the follow-up. For the present study, five representative slices, equally spaced within the median third of the second metamer were chosen for each animal.…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties can be encountered during the removal operation, such as refracture due to bone formation around the rods [5,6]. Moreover, metallic bone fixation devices have disadvantages such as corrosion and higher stiffness than the bone, which could cause bone resorption [7,8]. Bioresorbable IM rods could potentially overcome these complications as they would be totally resorbable (therefore, removal surgery would not be required), biocompatible, able to accelerate or facilitate tissue healing and their mechanical properties could be engineered to gradually transfer stress allowing for progressive healing [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively poor mechanical properties for load-bearing applications are the main limitation for use of these bioresorbable polymers [13]. Thus, reinforcement is required to produce a device with mechanical properties matching that of cortical bone [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] GPa for Young's modulus and 90-140 MPa for flexural strength] [14,15]. Various methods have been explored to enhance the mechanical properties of polymers, such as self-reinforcement [16][17][18][19][20], particulate reinforcement [Hydroxyapatite (HA), Calcium phosphate (CaP)] [21][22][23][24][25] and drawing [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioresorbable devices may be useful for promoting healing in fixated ribs because of the gradual transfer of load from the fixation device to the healing bone over time (in contrast to the stress-shielding scenario associated with permanently rigid metal fixation devices) (Viljanen et al 2001). The obvious utility of such devices is tempered by the relative infancy of the technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel concept for rib fixation involves the use of bioresorbable (absorbable) polymer intramedullary rib splints, for which the need for implant removal post-healing is eliminated, and which are compatible to magnetic resonance imaging (Viljanen et al 2001;Marasco 2010). Bioresorbable devices may be useful for promoting healing in fixated ribs because of the gradual transfer of load from the fixation device to the healing bone over time (in contrast to the stress-shielding scenario associated with permanently rigid metal fixation devices) (Viljanen et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%