2006
DOI: 10.1038/ng1106-1223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a proteomic approach with a microarray-based approach to detect exons in the mouse genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gygi et al detected a 20 fold-increase in protein expression for some genes that were unaltered at the mRNA level by microarray analysis [16], [54]. Clearly, a twofold differential expression of genes may not necessarily result in a twofold change in protein expression [55]. In addition, several mRNA molecules are not translated and may act as transcription regulators or may decay before protein is synthesized [56], [57] leading to a differential expression of genes, but not proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gygi et al detected a 20 fold-increase in protein expression for some genes that were unaltered at the mRNA level by microarray analysis [16], [54]. Clearly, a twofold differential expression of genes may not necessarily result in a twofold change in protein expression [55]. In addition, several mRNA molecules are not translated and may act as transcription regulators or may decay before protein is synthesized [56], [57] leading to a differential expression of genes, but not proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%