2003
DOI: 10.1080/01431160210145597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a new algorithm with the supervised classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the overall accuracy, Kappa statistic and a relative measure-total normalized probability of misclassification (TNPM) [10] to compare the results of the three classifiers. Comparison of results can be seen in TABLE III.…”
Section: B Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the overall accuracy, Kappa statistic and a relative measure-total normalized probability of misclassification (TNPM) [10] to compare the results of the three classifiers. Comparison of results can be seen in TABLE III.…”
Section: B Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised classification approach with Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) algorithms was employed to generate the three land cover maps using the band combinations of 4, 3, 2 (Red, Green and Blue bands) in the Thematic Mapper and ETM+7; and band 3, 4, 5 of the Landsat 8 imagery. Supervised classification of imagery through MLC is the most widely accepted and standard algorithm classifier for assessing land cover change (Emrahoğlu et al, 2003), as it examines both variance and covariance of spectral classes (Lillesand et al, 2004). Using this technique, training samples were selected to generate the land cover classes which are typical representatives of the prevailing land cover types of the study area.…”
Section: Data Processing and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franklin and Wulder (2002) have regarded parametric classifi ers such as MLC as robust and well-behaved and capable of providing optimal or near-optimal decisions on covertype classes. Emrahoglu et al (2003), while conceding that MLC is the most popular statistical algorithm and widely accepted standard approach, compared its performance with a new algorithm devised by selecting features from both condensed nearest neighbour (CNN) and a standard normal distribution. The authors refer to this technique as the selected pixel classifi cation (SPC) method as opposed to nearest neighbour method where whole pixels are used for the purpose of classifying an image.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Classifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%