2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: The influence of models complexity and training dataset size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
143
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(108 reference statements)
6
143
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Logistic regression and Naïve Bayes are the most widely used parametric classification algorithms (Tsangaratos & Ilia, 2016). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Rule Induction, K-nn and Neural Networks are their non-parametric counterparts (Aliwy & Ameer, 2017).…”
Section: Text Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic regression and Naïve Bayes are the most widely used parametric classification algorithms (Tsangaratos & Ilia, 2016). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Rule Induction, K-nn and Neural Networks are their non-parametric counterparts (Aliwy & Ameer, 2017).…”
Section: Text Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, using a performance metric to assess prediction robustness is necessary and for this reason, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) will be implemented as the only metric for the objective functions in hyperparameter tuning and one of three overall performance indicators of the landslides predictive models. In general, AUC can be interpreted as "the probability of a classifier is able to correctly anticipate the occurrence or non-occurrence of predefined events" [16]; which is rather convenient, because maximizing the AUC value is the equivalent to maximizing the overall accuracy (Acc) of the classifier. AUC could be quantified [6] as follows: excellent (0.9-1), very good (0.8-0.9), good (0.7-0.8), average (0.6-0.7), and poor (0.5-0.6).…”
Section: Model Training Validation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis is based on the assumption that: "a model is sufficient and accurate when there is an increase in the landslide density ratio when moving from low to high susceptible classes and high susceptibility classes cover small areas extent" [16]. The sufficiency analysis can be performed by reclassifying the probability grids generated by each model for the study area using Table 6.…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Map Generation and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic regression is a multivariate statistical method to establish the relationship between a dependent variable and several independent variables [6,35,38,[77][78][79]. In recent years, the logical regression model has been commonly used for LSM due to its simplicity and effectiveness [18,58,[80][81][82].…”
Section: Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%