2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2220-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a fuzzy control and the data-driven model for flood forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation performance of the two models on great floods is shown in Table 7. 1 The average value in Table 7 is obtained from the qualified flood events.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulation Results Of Floods Under Different Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation performance of the two models on great floods is shown in Table 7. 1 The average value in Table 7 is obtained from the qualified flood events.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulation Results Of Floods Under Different Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the improvement of hydrological data acquisition technology and the development of artificial intelligence computing, data-driven flood forecasting models have gained increasing attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The development of intelligent computing has gone through three important stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NSE of the predictive results is 0.9747. Compared with physical-based models, data-driven models demand fewer data and computational resources, rendering them more accessible to implement (Das et al 2016;Sun et al 2016). Currently, both the physical modeling approach and the data-driven approach are widely applied in water level prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%