2017
DOI: 10.5194/wes-2-15-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a coupled near- and far-wake model with a free-wake vortex code

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents the integration of a near-wake model for trailing vorticity, which is based on a prescribed-wake lifting-line model proposed by Beddoes (1987), with a blade element momentum (BEM)-based far-wake model and a 2-D shed vorticity model. The resulting coupled aerodynamics model is validated against lifting-surface computations performed using a free-wake panel code. The focus of the description of the aerodynamics model is on the numerical stability, the computation speed and the accur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it will not accurately model the dynamics of the tip vortex due to dynamic changes in loading. This is also the case for any common BEM tip loss correction; the vortex dynamics can be accounted for by the near wake model . Nevertheless, the present modification is expected to improve simulation results in dynamic situations, for example, due to turbulent inflow, because it takes the rotation of the resulting force into account.…”
Section: A Modified Tip Correctionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it will not accurately model the dynamics of the tip vortex due to dynamic changes in loading. This is also the case for any common BEM tip loss correction; the vortex dynamics can be accounted for by the near wake model . Nevertheless, the present modification is expected to improve simulation results in dynamic situations, for example, due to turbulent inflow, because it takes the rotation of the resulting force into account.…”
Section: A Modified Tip Correctionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is also the case for any common BEM tip loss correction; the vortex dynamics can be accounted for by the near wake model. 11 Nevertheless, the present modification is expected to improve simulation results in dynamic situations, for example, due to turbulent inflow, because it takes the rotation of the resulting force into account. FIGURE 1 Sketches of the aerodynamic forces at an airfoil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence determining the correction 10 velocity is an iterative procedure. We use the technique by Pirrung et al (2017a) established for the NWM to accelerate and ensure its convergence. Furthermore the activation of the correction is delayed until the starting vorticity of the rotor has been transported at least one blade length away from the rotor plane.…”
Section: Tip/smearing Correction For the Actuator Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore differences are expected close to the root and the tip of the blade, where the induction from a helical wake deviates most from the induction due to a cylindrical wake. An option to address these limitations is to couple a vortex-based near wake model to the BEM code (Pirrung et al, 2016(Pirrung et al, , 2017. However, the work in IEA Task 29 has shown 685 that care has to be taken when coupling the induction dynamics (Schepers et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Dynamic Inflowmentioning
confidence: 99%