2022
DOI: 10.1002/pros.24420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 68Ga‐PSMA PET/CT and mp‐MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: A retrospective study

Abstract: Background: Imaging modalities are used to diagnose and clinical grading of clinically significant prostate cancer. In this study, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (PSMA) and multiparametric prostate MRI (mp-MRI) were compared in regard to locating intraprostatic tumor and locoregional staging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for identifying intraprostatic index lesions, involving 40 patients correlated with prostatectomy. They reported a sensitivity of 42.5% and a specificity of 90.7% for PSMA PET in detecting intraprostatic index lesions [20]. In line with this, our study which systematically assessed various volumetric 68 Ga-PSMA PET parameters in both standard and early time PET images, demonstrated a correlation between 68 Ga-PSMA PET parameters and tumor aggressiveness, aligning with previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for identifying intraprostatic index lesions, involving 40 patients correlated with prostatectomy. They reported a sensitivity of 42.5% and a specificity of 90.7% for PSMA PET in detecting intraprostatic index lesions [20]. In line with this, our study which systematically assessed various volumetric 68 Ga-PSMA PET parameters in both standard and early time PET images, demonstrated a correlation between 68 Ga-PSMA PET parameters and tumor aggressiveness, aligning with previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Prostate hyperplasia is characterized by swelling of the prostate surface, an absence of a high T2w signal on the prostate surface, presumed to be between the prostate and the anus or between the prostate and the seminal vesicles, and a low T2w signal or a large signal in the seminal vesicles (12,13). Recent advances in positron-emission tomography (PET)/MRI scanner technology have demonstrated the possibility of combining metabolic/receptor information from PET with anatomical and functional imaging from MRI in a multimodal manner (14). While most of the studies on PET/MRI have been on restaging for PCa after treatment, diagnosis of the dominant lesion and characterization using PET/MRI has been an area of increasing interest in recent years, especially with the development of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radio ligands (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gallium‐68 prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) is one of the most frequently researched methods for primary staging. Some studies found a comparable detection rate between 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric prostate MRI, some studies stated that PSMA PET/CT provides additional contribution in lesion detection 20,21 . In most recent comparative studies PSMA PET/MRI showed a better intraprostatic lesion detection rate than multiparametric prostate MRI 22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found a comparable detection rate between 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric prostate MRI, some studies stated that PSMA PET/CT provides additional contribution in lesion detection. 20,21 In most recent comparative studies PSMA PET/MRI showed a better intraprostatic lesion detection rate than multiparametric prostate MRI. 22,23 Due to studies demonstrating the high diagnostic value of PSMA PET/CT in primary local staging, whether it will contribute to the detection of lesions with cribriform architecture may be the subject of further 24 Among the strengths of our study, evaluation within a homogeneous group can be counted as the most important one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%