2017
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 4 Methods for Dynamization of Locking Plates: Differences in the Amount and Type of Fracture Motion

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(14,15) The FCL system differs from the conventional locked screws; at the near cortex, the core diameter of the MotionLoc screw (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is smaller and does not engage the plate closest to the cortex, thereby providing the necessary motion at the near cortex. (7,9,22,23) The clinical impact of the FCL technique on long fractures was confirmed by several biomechanical studies that showed multiple benefits of reducing axial stiffness by providing approximately parallel interfragmentary micro motion. (7,9,22,23) Clinical studies have provided strong evidence to support the advantages of the FCL technique in fracture management, indicating multiple benefits such as safety and effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14,15) The FCL system differs from the conventional locked screws; at the near cortex, the core diameter of the MotionLoc screw (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is smaller and does not engage the plate closest to the cortex, thereby providing the necessary motion at the near cortex. (7,9,22,23) The clinical impact of the FCL technique on long fractures was confirmed by several biomechanical studies that showed multiple benefits of reducing axial stiffness by providing approximately parallel interfragmentary micro motion. (7,9,22,23) Clinical studies have provided strong evidence to support the advantages of the FCL technique in fracture management, indicating multiple benefits such as safety and effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(7,9,22,23) The clinical impact of the FCL technique on long fractures was confirmed by several biomechanical studies that showed multiple benefits of reducing axial stiffness by providing approximately parallel interfragmentary micro motion. (7,9,22,23) Clinical studies have provided strong evidence to support the advantages of the FCL technique in fracture management, indicating multiple benefits such as safety and effectiveness. (11,12,(24)(25)(26) In 2014, Bottlang et al (24) demonstrated that FCL was both safe and effective in treating a series of 31 distal femoral fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Screw type and placement, bridge length, and plate type can be varied to alter stiffness; however, for these, surgeons must rely on their experience, which can lead to inconsistent outcomes. Constructs with controlled motion including the dynamic locking screw (DLS) (Röderer et al, 2014 ), far cortical locking screw (FLS) (Doornink et al, 2011 ), and active LP (Bottlang et al, 2016 ; Henschel et al, 2017 ; Madey et al, 2017 offer a more reliable solution. The DLS allows micromotion at the near cortex up to 0.45 mm via a pin-sleeve design; the FLS provides a motion envelope at the near cortex up to 0.75 mm (half of the 4.5-mm cortical tread at the far cortex minus a 3-mm bypass at the near cortex); and the active LP enables a maximum axial micromotion of 1.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key draw-back of this design is the lack of design capacity to achieve micromotion. However, it should be noted, that any of these three stiffness modulated designs in Figure 4, could also incorporate dynamisation through micromotion between the screw and plate, as incorporated in the locking plate (Henschel et al, 2017). Finally the Material Heterogeneity design, generated issues similar to the telescopic and lattice structures in terms of post-processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the design of bone plates requires fixation yet also the capacity for micromotion. Recent developments in bone plate design have aimed to achieve these opposing yet simultaneous requirements (Henschel et al, 2017), albeit through generic design. HTO is a widely recognised treatment for patients who have unicompartmental arthritis with malalignment of the mechanical axis (Röderer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%