2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between weight loss of bends in a pneumatic conveyor and erosion rate obtained in a centrifugal erosion tester for the same materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no a “universal” testing method providing the answer, what material is the optimal for different wear or wear–corrosion conditions, which may occur in service. A variety of wear, specifically erosion, testing methods and involved apparatus were described and discussed in literature, where different abrasive media, hydrodynamic flows’ features, and environments are employed simulating certain application conditions 2,13,35,37,56–66 . The most employed erosion resistance testing methods include ASTM C704, G76, and G73 (or their modification), slurry jet erosion testing, centrifugal‐based erosion and slurry erosion–corrosion methods, and some others, which allow simulation and evaluation of advanced materials, particularly ceramics and coatings, in certain application conditions.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Application Properties (Wear and Corrosion...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no a “universal” testing method providing the answer, what material is the optimal for different wear or wear–corrosion conditions, which may occur in service. A variety of wear, specifically erosion, testing methods and involved apparatus were described and discussed in literature, where different abrasive media, hydrodynamic flows’ features, and environments are employed simulating certain application conditions 2,13,35,37,56–66 . The most employed erosion resistance testing methods include ASTM C704, G76, and G73 (or their modification), slurry jet erosion testing, centrifugal‐based erosion and slurry erosion–corrosion methods, and some others, which allow simulation and evaluation of advanced materials, particularly ceramics and coatings, in certain application conditions.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Application Properties (Wear and Corrosion...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of wear, specifically erosion, testing methods and involved apparatus were described and discussed in literature, where different abrasive media, hydrodynamic flows' features, and environments are employed simulating certain application conditions. 2,13,35,37,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] The most employed erosion resistance testing methods include ASTM C704, G76, and G73 (or their modification), slurry jet erosion testing, centrifugal-based erosion and slurry erosion-corrosion methods, and some others, which allow simulation and evaluation of advanced materials, particularly ceramics and coatings, in certain application conditions. The testing principles and schematics of some of these methods are shown in Figures 6-9.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Application Properties (Wear and Corrosion...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on wear and wear-corrosion resistance reported in literature depend on the testing method, testing conditions and employed apparatus. For erosion and erosioncorrosion studies, various testing methods and related equipment, such as a blasting unit (the simplest method for dry testing conditions) and different "pot" testers [38][39][40][41], slurry jet erosion testing devices [40][41][42][43], Coriolis erosion testing equipment [31,42,44,45], slurry whirling arm ring tester [32,46] and some other equipment [47][48][49][50][51][52], could be utilized. There are no standardized methods for testing and evaluation of erosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, coal and biomass-fired power plants can benefit from accurate measurement of fuel flow rate with improved combustion efficiency and reduced pollutant emission. Moreover, based on the mass flow rate of particles in the pipeline, optimal conveying conditions can be reached, which would reduce energy consumption and wear on equipment [1]. However, as the particle flow in fuel injection pipelines is very complex in terms of gas-solids two-phase flow nature and is in a dilute suspension, the online mass flow metering of particles is recognized as a long-standing industrial problem [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%