2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10941-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between water quality indices in watersheds of the Southern Bahia (Brazil) with different land use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where n is the total number of water quality parameters studied, Ci is the normalized value of parameter i, and Pi is the assigned weighting of the ith parameter. WQI values range from 0 to 100, and water quality is divided into five levels according to the WQI score: excellent (91-100), good (71-90), medium (51-70), poor (26-50) and very poor (0-25) [32].…”
Section: Water Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the total number of water quality parameters studied, Ci is the normalized value of parameter i, and Pi is the assigned weighting of the ith parameter. WQI values range from 0 to 100, and water quality is divided into five levels according to the WQI score: excellent (91-100), good (71-90), medium (51-70), poor (26-50) and very poor (0-25) [32].…”
Section: Water Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hypothesized (H1), the downstream alpha diversity was significantly lower than that of the upstream, indicating that the diversity of microeukaryotes decreased significantly with the severity of water quality damage in the lentic-lotic continuum catchment. The decrease of downstream diversity may be due to the excessive interference of urban and agricultural activities on the water environment (higher TN and TP) ( Teng et al, 2011;Hao et al, 2012;Hosen et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2017;Lopes et al, 2021). The variabilities of the community composition in BYD were significantly lower than that of upstream and downstream communities, reflecting significant changes in relative abundances of various taxa in upstream and downstream.…”
Section: Changes In Microeukaryotic Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporam nas funções matemáticas de agregação final, valores padrões de referência para os parâmetros analisados, que podem ser baseados na legislação. Este é o caso do IQA CCME, que já foi aplicado em estudos no Brasil (e.g., Lopes et al, 2021;Oliveira et al, 2021;Val;Moleiro;Oliveira, 2022) e do NPI, que até o presente momento parece ter aplicação insipiente no país.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified