SAE Technical Paper Series 2020
DOI: 10.4271/2019-36-0144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the WLTC and the FTP-75 driving cycles applied to a 1.4 L light-duty vehicle running on ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The driving cycle is assessed using a pool of engine torque and speed points, not vehicle speed points. For the purposes of pollutant emission analysis, there are modal driving cycles (e.g., NEDC-New European Driving Cycle) and transition driving cycles (e.g., FTP75-Federal Test Procedure, Artemis-Assessment and Reliability of Transport Emission Models and Inventory Systems) [44][45][46]. They differ in that modal cycles are a compilation of periods of simple acceleration and constant speeds, while transition cycles include many speed changes typical of road conditions [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The driving cycle is assessed using a pool of engine torque and speed points, not vehicle speed points. For the purposes of pollutant emission analysis, there are modal driving cycles (e.g., NEDC-New European Driving Cycle) and transition driving cycles (e.g., FTP75-Federal Test Procedure, Artemis-Assessment and Reliability of Transport Emission Models and Inventory Systems) [44][45][46]. They differ in that modal cycles are a compilation of periods of simple acceleration and constant speeds, while transition cycles include many speed changes typical of road conditions [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%