2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the photocatalytic inactivation of Gram-positive E. faecalis and Gram-negative E. coli faecal contamination indicator microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ions such as Cu 2+ and Ag + in combination with TiO 2 were reported to enhance its antimicrobial activity (72). Furthermore, the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 was reported as performed against pure bacterial cultures, mixed cultures (128) and natural communities (129)(130)(131). As a general concept, photocatalytic surfaces or suspensions are referred to as being self-disinfecting rather than self-sterilizing.…”
Section: In Vitro Evaluation Of Tio 2 Antibacte-rial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ions such as Cu 2+ and Ag + in combination with TiO 2 were reported to enhance its antimicrobial activity (72). Furthermore, the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 was reported as performed against pure bacterial cultures, mixed cultures (128) and natural communities (129)(130)(131). As a general concept, photocatalytic surfaces or suspensions are referred to as being self-disinfecting rather than self-sterilizing.…”
Section: In Vitro Evaluation Of Tio 2 Antibacte-rial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, different standard methods for testing antimicrobial efficiency of photocatalytic processes are available. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to compare results from different research groups, mainly because different bacterial strains have been used with different growth media and experimental conditions (128). A rigorous and scientific approach would be very helpful in order to produce comparable results and evaluate the real efficacy of photocatalysts in killing bacteria cells.…”
Section: Visai Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se observa que en los experimentos realizados con NaCl no se alcanzó la desinfección efectiva, a diferencia de las pruebas realizadas con CaCO 3 y MgSO 4 . Es posible que el NaCl genere condiciones que favorecen la regeneración de la bacteria [20]. Los carbonatos también influencian el proceso e inhiben la desinfección efectiva, mientras que los sulfatos no provocan modificaciones dicho proceso.…”
Section: |unclassified
“…The observed differences could mainly be attributed to several reasons, such as (i) impact of organic carbon composition of greywater samples; (ii) differences in cell wall complexity and thickness between Gram positive (FS) and Gram negative bacteria such as coliforms (TC and FC); and (iii) the presence of common anions in solution matrix. Since the hydroxyl radical attack occurs on the cell wall of bacteria, attention should be paid to differences in cell wall complexity and thickness, which may be the reason of different photocatalytic inactivation profiles [34][35][36]. FS were known to be a sub-group of Gram-positive bacteria which have considerably thicker cell walls consisting of many complex layers of lipopolysaccharides and lipoproteins.…”
Section: Kinetic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the hydroxyl radical attack occurs on the cell wall of bacteria, attention should be paid to differences in cell wall complexity and thickness, which may be the reason of different photocatalytic inactivation profiles [34][35][36]. FS were known to be a sub-group of Gram-positive bacteria which have considerably thicker cell walls consisting of many complex layers of lipopolysaccharides and lipoproteins.…”
Section: Kinetic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%