Comparison between the perinatal risk inventory and the nursery neurobiological risk score for predicting development in high-risk newborn infants

Zaramella, Patrizia; Freato, Federica; Milan, À; Grisafi, Davide; Vianello, Andrea; Chiandetti, Lino

doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.003

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the overall PERI score, our sample should be considered as a rather "high-risk" sample. Insecure infants had a mean PERI score of 10.92; it has been shown that scores of 10 and higher are strongly predictive of negative developmental outcome at 9 and 18 months (Scheiner & Sexton, 1991;Zaramella et al, 2008). The high PERI in this sample did not cause any developmental delay at 6 months (corrected age).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…Low-risk (0-4 points) infants were characterized as presenting few medical complications (e.g., mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hr after birth, infectious disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, meningitis); all full-term infants obtained perinatal risk scores of 0 to 4 points (Pierrehumbert, Nicole, Muller-Nix, Forcada-Guex, & Ansermet, 2003). Moreover, it has been shown that scores of 10 and higher are strongly predictive of negative developmental outcome at 9 and 18 months (Scheiner & Sexton, 1991;Zaramella et al, 2008). At 4 months, a play situation lasting 5 min was videotaped.…”

Section: Procedures and Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of attachment, perinatal risk, and mother–infant interaction in a high‐risk premature sample

Udry-Jørgensen¹,

Pierrehumbert²,

Borghini³

et al. 2011

Infant Mental Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thirty-three families, each with a premature infant born less than 33 gestational weeks, were observed in a longitudinal exploratory study. Infants were recruited in a neonatal intensive care unit, and follow-up visits took place at 4 months and 12 months of corrected age. The severity of the perinatal problems was evaluated using the Perinatal Risk Inventory (PERI; A.P. Scheiner & M.E. Sexton, 1991). At 4 months, mother-infant play interaction was observed and coded according to the CARE-index (P.M. Crittenden, 2003); at 12 months, the Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; M.D.S. Ainsworth, M.C. Blehar, E. Waters, & S. Wall, 1978) was administered. Results indicate a strong correlation between the severity of perinatal problems and the quality of attachment at 12 months. Based on the PERI, infants with high medical risks more frequently tended to be insecurely attached. There also was a significant correlation between insecure attachment and dyadic play interaction at 4 months (i.e., maternal controlling behavior and infant compulsive compliance). Moreover, specific dyadic interactive patterns could be identified as protective or as risk factors regarding the quality of attachment. Considering that attachment may have long-term influence on child development, these results underline the need for particular attention to risk factors regarding attachment among premature infants.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

Section: Procedures and Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of attachment, perinatal risk, and mother–infant interaction in a high‐risk premature sample

Udry-Jørgensen¹,

Pierrehumbert²,

Borghini³

et al. 2011

Infant Mental Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this regard, previous studies (Pérez López et al, 2009;Zaramella et al, 2008) have used motor and developmental scales as general predictors of cognitive capacity and motor development, taking into account neurological status and using pre-discharge evaluations of the child. Mental and psychomotor progress also appear to be related to the risk level of a child at birth, in addition to other environmental variables.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this sense, various studies (Dorling, Field, & Manktelow, 2005;Pasman, Rotteveel, Maassen, de Graaf, & Kollée, 1998;Spittle et al, 2014;Zaramella et al, 2008) have indicated that the PERI is useful for assessing a child's risk through their subsequent development and for rapidly and reliably predicting the child's future development. The current study found a negative correlation between the PERI and the development of visual-perceptive abilities at four and five years of age, which might influence the process of learning to read, an important skill for academic performance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Neuropsychological assessment and perinatal risk: A study amongst very premature born 4- and 5-year old children

Sanchez-Joya

Sánchez‐Labraca

Roldan-Tapia

et al. 2017

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Prematurity and its consequences are serious problems that can result in numerous neurosensory disabilities and cerebral cognitive dysfunctions. The Perinatal Risk Index (PERI) might provide a predictive measure of these problems. Aim:This study compared the cognitive development of prematurely born children at 4 and 5 years of age with age-matched peers born at term. The secondary objective was to determine whether a correlation exists between perinatal risk and performance on neuropsychological tests among premature children.Methods: A total of 54 children between four and five years of age were evaluated; 27 were born very premature (premature group; PG), and 27 were born at term (term group; TG). Executive function, attention, memory, language, visual perception, and spatial structuring were evaluated. Subtests from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, the Rey Complex Figure Test, the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Test A, Trails A and B, the spatial structuring questionnaire from the Child Neuropsychological Maturity Questionnaire, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children were used. A PERI score was also obtained for the PG. Results:The PG showed significantly lower scores than the TG in all the studied cognitive domains. Visualperceptive scores were significantly and negatively correlated with the PERI scores of the PG. Conclusions:The PG showed neurocognitive deficits compared with the TG. The PERI can be used to predict the development of visual-perceptive abilities in children between four and five years of age.

show abstract

Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Preterm Babies Using Risk Stratification Score

Sujatha

Jain

2016

Indian J Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison between the perinatal risk inventory and the nursery neurobiological risk score for predicting development in high-risk newborn infants

Cited by 10 publications

References 38 publications

Quality of attachment, perinatal risk, and mother–infant interaction in a high‐risk premature sample

Quality of attachment, perinatal risk, and mother–infant interaction in a high‐risk premature sample

Neuropsychological assessment and perinatal risk: A study amongst very premature born 4- and 5-year old children

Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Preterm Babies Using Risk Stratification Score

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About