2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the macroinfauna of urbanized and protected beaches in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
60
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the results obtained for E. braziliensis in Barra do Sul, Veloso et al, (2006;, on beaches of Rio de Janeiro, also found lower total densities of juveniles, males and females of this species on urbanized reflective beaches with higher numbers of users. In Barra da Tijuca, Veloso et al, (2011) highlight that human disturbance may be affecting the population of E. braziliensis: 1) directly, through human trampling and/or natural habitat jeopardizing, consequences of the great flux of visitors and urbanization, or 2) indirectly, by the isolation of individuals in the preserved stretch, located between environments subject to intense disturbance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly to the results obtained for E. braziliensis in Barra do Sul, Veloso et al, (2006;, on beaches of Rio de Janeiro, also found lower total densities of juveniles, males and females of this species on urbanized reflective beaches with higher numbers of users. In Barra da Tijuca, Veloso et al, (2011) highlight that human disturbance may be affecting the population of E. braziliensis: 1) directly, through human trampling and/or natural habitat jeopardizing, consequences of the great flux of visitors and urbanization, or 2) indirectly, by the isolation of individuals in the preserved stretch, located between environments subject to intense disturbance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In Rio de Janeiro, Veloso et al (2006) also found significant differences in the macrobenthic communities of intermediate and reflective beaches, noting low abundances on urbanized beaches. Moreover, Jaramillo et al (1996) concluded that the presence of human beings produces no significant adverse effects on the macroinfauna of reflective beaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, some studies illustrated an overall remarkable negative impact on supralittoral species as a result of human beach use (e.g. Fanini et al, 2005;Veloso et al, 2006Veloso et al, , 2008Ugolini et al, 2008) and shoreline modifications such as the construction of seawalls or beach nourishment actions (e.g. Bessa et al, 2013;Dugan and Hubbard, 2006;Fanini et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, on urbanised coasts (sensu Veloso et al, 2006), management practices such as nourishment and coastal armouring have been intensively used to counteract the erosive evolution of coasts, but the ecological implications of these actions are less considered Schlacher et al, 2006). Superimposed on these trends of coastal impacts is the predicted increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme natural phenomena (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%