2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the gold standard DXA with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound based-strategy (QUS) to detect osteoporosis in an HIV infected cohort

Abstract: We observed that patients with osteoporosis determined by calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and/or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry have higher probability to undergo vertebral fracture, but neither of them can be used for predicting vertebral fracture. Use of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound for screening is a reasonable alternative of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry since our study confirm that none strategy is clearly superior, but both screen tools must be always completed with X-ray.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors used a heel ultrasound as the outcome measure in this study to assess the effects of non-elite sports. Many studies indicated that a heel ultrasound is used to assess bone structure and strength and is used worldwide for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment when DXA the gold standard tool in diagnosis is not available, although it is not to be used as a diagnostic tool (ISCD, 2013;Quiros Roldan et al, 2017). The positive attributes of the heel ultrasound test are that it involves no risks or harm and is a cost-effective, comfortable, pain-free, and radiation-free test that is easy to use and only takes a few minutes to perform (Shewale et al, 2017;Komar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used a heel ultrasound as the outcome measure in this study to assess the effects of non-elite sports. Many studies indicated that a heel ultrasound is used to assess bone structure and strength and is used worldwide for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment when DXA the gold standard tool in diagnosis is not available, although it is not to be used as a diagnostic tool (ISCD, 2013;Quiros Roldan et al, 2017). The positive attributes of the heel ultrasound test are that it involves no risks or harm and is a cost-effective, comfortable, pain-free, and radiation-free test that is easy to use and only takes a few minutes to perform (Shewale et al, 2017;Komar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been pointed by previous authors, quantitative ultrasound is comparable to DEXA in terms of determining BMD. 28 , 29 , 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SONOST classifies results as normal (>–1), osteopenic (–1 to –2.5), or osteoporotic (≤–2.5) using T-scores, which represent BQI in standard deviation units from the mean in healthy young adults of the same sex. QUS T-scores correlate well with DEXA in PWH ( r s = .43–.55; all P < .001) [29]. Three QUS measurements of the nondominant foot were performed to obtain an average.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%