2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the first and second wave crest amplitude generated by landslides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is a typical characteristic of the head wave height in the near-field area of a partially submerged landslide (Xue et al 2019, Wang et al 2019. Subsequent to the first wave, the impulse waves rapidly attenuate in height, and the energy is continuously dissipated, fluctuating around 10 m. At water level of 2865 m, the maximum head wave height is 12.28 m, and the run-up wave height on the opposite bank is 18.05 m. The impulse wave pattern is comparable to that observed at 2785 m.…”
Section: Waves Generation Processmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This pattern is a typical characteristic of the head wave height in the near-field area of a partially submerged landslide (Xue et al 2019, Wang et al 2019. Subsequent to the first wave, the impulse waves rapidly attenuate in height, and the energy is continuously dissipated, fluctuating around 10 m. At water level of 2865 m, the maximum head wave height is 12.28 m, and the run-up wave height on the opposite bank is 18.05 m. The impulse wave pattern is comparable to that observed at 2785 m.…”
Section: Waves Generation Processmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The wave properties of SLTs depend on the kinematic and geometric parameters of the initial landslides, such as the landslide front impacted velocity v, landslide thickness s, landslide width b, landslide length l and landslide impact angles which is the same as the hill slope angle α, varying from 15 to 40 in this study (Ataie-Ashtiani & Najafi-Jilani, 2008;Cui & Zhu, 2011;Fritz et al, 2004;Heller, 2008;Heller & Hager, 2010;Huang et al, 2014;Mohammed & Fritz, 2012;Panizzo et al, 2005;Walder et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2017Wang et al, , 2019. All 84 tests included five kinds of block landslides, four values of h and five values of α (the experimental parameters for all tests are shown in Table 1).…”
Section: Dimensionless Parametersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the effect of the difference in pressure between the inside and outside of the cavity, the surrounding water quickly converged into the cavity and collided, and then gradually formed the second crest with a larger height than the first crest. Wang et al (2019) pointed out that the amplitudes of these first two crests are generally different and the second crest has the highest amplitude when the slide volume is small or the slide Froude number is large. The second crest was formed at t* = 5.742 and propagated towards the direction of the sea-wall.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ataie-Ashtiani and performed 120 physical model tests to investigate wave characteristics of submarine landslide-induced tsunamis, and relative prediction methods of near-field characteristics were proposed in their later research works (Najafi-Jilani and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2008). Wang et al (2019) used 49 physical model tests to design an orthogonal experiment to compare the amplitude of the first and second wave crests induced by a landslide. The aforementioned experiments do not incorporate detailed fluid-field distribution information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%