2021
DOI: 10.1111/eje.12733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between students' self‐evaluation and faculty members' evaluation in a clinical endodontic course at King Saud University

Abstract: Introduction The objective of this study was to compare faculty member evaluations with student self‐evaluations in a clinical endodontic course in the dental school at King Saud University and to evaluate the reliability of the students' self‐assessment scores after using a rubric with well‐defined criteria. Materials and methods Evaluated and self‐evaluated endodontic cases that were clinically treated by the fourth‐year undergraduate dental students at the College of Dentistry, Girls University Campus, at K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, they all have access to sufficient materials (often including assessment rubrics) to conduct a reasonably objective evaluation of their students' proficiency in these areas. Self-evaluation, co-assessment, the use of multiple examinations, and assessment rubrics have all been used in the past, but all methods have their limitations (Almohaimede, 2022;Arce, Suárez-García, López-Vázquez, & Fernández-Ibáñez, 2022). However, educators are unhappy with the lack of focus on cultivating students' capacity for critical thinking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, they all have access to sufficient materials (often including assessment rubrics) to conduct a reasonably objective evaluation of their students' proficiency in these areas. Self-evaluation, co-assessment, the use of multiple examinations, and assessment rubrics have all been used in the past, but all methods have their limitations (Almohaimede, 2022;Arce, Suárez-García, López-Vázquez, & Fernández-Ibáñez, 2022). However, educators are unhappy with the lack of focus on cultivating students' capacity for critical thinking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the assessment more reliable and valid, an analytical grading rubric was specifically designed for the used DOPS form (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007). This also helped make the assessment criteria explicit to both students and faculty, thus enabling feedback and self‐assessment (Almohaimede, 2021; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%