2010
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.i.01122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Standard and High-Flexion Posterior-Stabilized Rotating-Platform Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties

Abstract: This prospective randomized study revealed no significant differences between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in terms of clinical or radiographic outcomes or range of motion at a minimum of two years postoperatively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
57
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they found no significant differences between high-flexion and standard TKA designs in terms of range of motion, knee scores, patient's satisfaction, and complications, the types of high-flexion and standard implants used in the randomized controlled trial were limited to NexGen knee system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) (LPS-flex [4,6,11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or CR-flex [3,7]) or P.F.C. Sigma knee system (RP-F [1,2,31,32] or CR 150 [33]). Because both NexGen and P.F.C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they found no significant differences between high-flexion and standard TKA designs in terms of range of motion, knee scores, patient's satisfaction, and complications, the types of high-flexion and standard implants used in the randomized controlled trial were limited to NexGen knee system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) (LPS-flex [4,6,11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or CR-flex [3,7]) or P.F.C. Sigma knee system (RP-F [1,2,31,32] or CR 150 [33]). Because both NexGen and P.F.C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that femoral rollback and tibial internal rotation correlated with maximum flexion angle. The high-flexion knee prostheses were designed to enhance knee flexion by providing extended femoral condyles which allow posterior femoral rollback with increasing knee flexion [1,3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early aseptic loosening of the femoral component reportedly occurs in 0% to 0.9% of patients at 2 to 10 years [4,10,27,29,44,48] in conventional TKA, and concerns have therefore been raised about the high incidence of early aseptic loosening in HF designs [7,17]. However, a number of clinical studies reporting 25 to 259 knees [3,8,20,[24][25][26] have suggested conflicting findings with only a few instances of prosthesis-related failures after HF TKA at mean followups of 12 to 51 months even in the same ethnic group [5,20,[24][25][26]41]. The risk of early aseptic loosening after HF TKA in large cohort studies is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies reported that patients with a high-flexion knee prosthesis gained more ROM than those with a conventional knee prosthesis [19][20][21]. However, other studies did not find a significant difference in knee motion between the high-flexion and conventional knee components [22][23][24]. From the systematic literature review of outcomes following TKA using the high-flexion knee prosthesis, Murphy et al [25] reported that there was insufficient evidence of improved range of motion or functional performance after high-flexion knee arthroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%