2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06771.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between spontaneous and kainate‐induced gamma oscillations in the mouse hippocampus in vitro

Abstract: Neuronal synchronization at gamma frequency, implicated in cognition, can be evoked in hippocampal slices by pharmacological activation. We characterized spontaneous small-amplitude gamma oscillations (SgammaO) recorded in area CA3 of mouse hippocampal slices and compared it with kainate-induced gamma oscillations (KgammaO). SgammaO had a lower peak frequency, a more sinusoidal waveform and was spatially less coherent than KgammaO, irrespective of oscillation amplitude. CA3a had the smallest oscillation power,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from our simulations are consistent with experiments in vitro showing that NMDAR blockade does not affect gamma oscillations that are, however, abolished by AMPAR antagonists (Traub et al, 1996;Buhl et al, 1998;Fisahn et al, 1998;LeBeau et al, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2006;Roopun et al, 2008). Moreover, in some in vivo and in vitro studies NMDAR blockade increased the gamma oscillation power (Roopun et al, 2008;Pinault, 2008;Hakami et al, 2009;Pietersen et al, 2009;Hong et al, 2010), consistent with the effect of lowering g ni in our simulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from our simulations are consistent with experiments in vitro showing that NMDAR blockade does not affect gamma oscillations that are, however, abolished by AMPAR antagonists (Traub et al, 1996;Buhl et al, 1998;Fisahn et al, 1998;LeBeau et al, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2006;Roopun et al, 2008). Moreover, in some in vivo and in vitro studies NMDAR blockade increased the gamma oscillation power (Roopun et al, 2008;Pinault, 2008;Hakami et al, 2009;Pietersen et al, 2009;Hong et al, 2010), consistent with the effect of lowering g ni in our simulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Conversely, decreases in the slow NMDA conductance at pyramidal-FS neuron synapses increased gamma power in the network model. Similarly, NMDAR antagonists enhance gamma power in animal models (Pinault, 2008;Roopun et al, 2008;Hakami et al, 2009;Pietersen et al, 2009) or human subjects (Hong et al, 2010). Our simulations therefore suggest that rapid FS neuron activation (Jonas et al, 2004;Hu et al, 2010) is crucial for the production of gamma oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamma oscillations in CA3 show the strongest sink–source sequence at the stratum pyramidale–stratum lucidum (Pietersen et al . ). In isolated CA1 slices (cut like in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lack of the rest of the brain and of blood supply obviously has a major impact, and indeed reduced activity can be an advantage for reductionist studies of the properties of single neurons and synaptic connections. However, the low levels of activity mean that population activities including coherent oscillations usually (but not always, Pietersen et al, 2009) need sustained chemical or other stimulation, such as mGluR agonists, kainic acid or carbachol (Bartos et al, 2007;Fisahn et al, 1998;Whittington et al, 1995). Such models, combined with computational models in silico (see Section 6 below), have told us much on how neuronal networks can sustain coherent oscillations, and especially on the important roles of inhibitory interneurons in γ oscillations (Bartos et al, 2007).…”
Section: Preparations and Physiological Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%