2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15113969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Space Mapping and Direct FEA Optimizations for the Design of Halbach Array PM Motor

Abstract: Effective methods for the design of high-performance electrical machines must use optimization techniques and precise and fast physical models. Convergence, precision and speed of execution are important issues, in addition to the ability to explore the entire domain of solutions. The finite element method (FEM) presents a high accuracy in the results but with high computational costs. Analytical models, on the other hand, solve the problem quickly but compromise the accuracy of the results. This work shows a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the use of this technology is limited to special applications, where performance cannot be degraded in favour of costs. In order to overcome these issues, the most common and cheap solution applied in industry is segmented magnetization, which consists of dividing the magnet into several segments, which are magnetized to reproduce a normal flux density component as close as possible to a sine wave [3][4][5]. However, a closed-form analytical model of the air-gap field resulting from this configuration is not available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the use of this technology is limited to special applications, where performance cannot be degraded in favour of costs. In order to overcome these issues, the most common and cheap solution applied in industry is segmented magnetization, which consists of dividing the magnet into several segments, which are magnetized to reproduce a normal flux density component as close as possible to a sine wave [3][4][5]. However, a closed-form analytical model of the air-gap field resulting from this configuration is not available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, physics-based models feature enhanced generalization capability [70]. The most popular modeling technique utilizing physics-based surrogates is arguably space mapping (SM) [71][72][73][74][75][76] along with its numerous variations such as aggressive [77], implicit [78], or frequency SM [79]. Still, the necessity to devise a problemdependent low-fidelity model significantly narrows down the application areas in which physics-based models may be utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%