2013
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2013.11680952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Single Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-incision surgery has benefits of fewer surgical wounds that allow faster recovery by reducing surgical stress and pain, leading to better cosmesis [ 2 ]. Despite these advantages, single-incision cholecystectomy has no advantages in operation time, the average length of stay in a hospital, return to normal activities, or postoperative quality of life compared to CLC [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-incision surgery has benefits of fewer surgical wounds that allow faster recovery by reducing surgical stress and pain, leading to better cosmesis [ 2 ]. Despite these advantages, single-incision cholecystectomy has no advantages in operation time, the average length of stay in a hospital, return to normal activities, or postoperative quality of life compared to CLC [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%