2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between RHD Simulation of Supercritical Accretion Flows and a Steady Model With Outflows

Abstract: We apply our two-dimensional (2D), radially self-similar steady-state accretion flow model to the analysis of hydrodynamic simulation results of supercritical accretion flows. Self-similarity is checked and the input parameters for the model calculation, such as advective factor and heat capacity ratio, are obtained from timeaveraged simulation data. Solutions of the model are then calculated and compared with the simulation results. We find that in the converged region of the simulation, excluding the part to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are having the inflow and outflow regions for a certain range of the viscosity parameters and they also depend on other disk parameters. Which is consistent with some analytical (Xu & Chen 1997;Xue & Wang 2005;Jiao & Wu 2011;Gu 2012Gu , 2015 and numerical simulation studies (Ohsuga et al 2005;Okuda et al 2007;Yuan et al 2012a,b;Yang et al 2014;Jiao et al 2015;Yuan et al 2015). Although, our solutions and the disk structure are quite different from the previous analytical studies on 2D disk flow with self-similar conditions, e.g., the size and shape of the disks, behavior of the solutions and supersonic regions.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results are having the inflow and outflow regions for a certain range of the viscosity parameters and they also depend on other disk parameters. Which is consistent with some analytical (Xu & Chen 1997;Xue & Wang 2005;Jiao & Wu 2011;Gu 2012Gu , 2015 and numerical simulation studies (Ohsuga et al 2005;Okuda et al 2007;Yuan et al 2012a,b;Yang et al 2014;Jiao et al 2015;Yuan et al 2015). Although, our solutions and the disk structure are quite different from the previous analytical studies on 2D disk flow with self-similar conditions, e.g., the size and shape of the disks, behavior of the solutions and supersonic regions.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In SS433, the much larger Eddington factorṁ w ∼ 10 4 implies a quasi-spherical wind speed close to the observed velocity width ∼1500 km s −1 of the so-called stationary H-α line. Recent numerical simulations (Jiao et al 2015) also find winds with velocities ∼0.1-0.2c except very close to the rotational axis, where the velocity is higher, as expected.…”
Section: H Y P E R -E D D I N G To N B L Ac K H O L E W I N D Ssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…If the wind is isotropically emitted, it significantly regulates accretion (Wang et al 2021a) and gas dynamical friction (Gruzinov et al 2020). On the other hand, if it is anisotropic, as predicted by numerical simulations (Jiao et al 2015;Kitaki et al 2021), the feedback does not efficiently regulate either accretion (Takeo et al 2020) or dynamical friction (Li et al 2020). Also, when the trapping radius is smaller than the circularization radius, the mass ratio of outflows to inflows is modest (Kitaki et al 2021).…”
Section: A3 Evolution Of Black Hole Mass and Locationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The cocoon dynamics may be also influenced by the winds launched in super-Eddington regimes (e.g. Jiao et al 2015;Kitaki et al 2021). To evaluate this influence, we compare the pressure of the wind to that of the cocoon.…”
Section: B2 Influence Of Winds On Cocoon Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation