2007
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/49/5/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between resistive and collisionless double tearing modes for nearby resonant surfaces

Abstract: The linear instability and nonlinear dynamics of collisional (resistive) and collisionless (due to electron inertia) double tearing modes (DTMs) are compared with the use of a reduced cylindrical model of a tokamak plasma. We focus on cases where two q = 2 resonant surfaces are located a small distance apart. It is found that regardless of the magnetic reconnection mechanism, resistivity or electron inertia, the fastest growing linear eigenmodes may have high poloidal mode numbers m ∼ 10. The spectrum of unsta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate for m peak is valid only for resistive DTMs. Nevertheless, broad spectra and high values m peak are also found when reconnection is mediated by electron inertia instead of resistivity, as is shown in a separate paper [21]. Also, Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimate for m peak is valid only for resistive DTMs. Nevertheless, broad spectra and high values m peak are also found when reconnection is mediated by electron inertia instead of resistivity, as is shown in a separate paper [21]. Also, Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The stabilization of high-m modes seems to depend on other factors, including the mechanism breaking the ideal-MHD constraint. For instance, collisionless DTMs due to electron inertia tend to have a broader spectrum of unstable modes than resistive DTMs for the same q profile [21].…”
Section: Comparison With Linear Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation code is based on that used in [7,[18][19][20], which solves the normalized and Fourier-analysed reduced MHD equations in the form…”
Section: Normalization and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Thus, the magnetic field can be expressed by the magnetic flux function w as B ¼ B ff þ rw Âf, where the toroidal field B f is assumed to be a constant,f Àẑ=R 0 qðaÞ is the unit vector in the toroidal direction, and a and R 0 are, respectively, the minor and major radius of the tokamak plasma. Under the assumption of incompressibility, the velocity can be represented as v ¼ Àr/ Âf, where / is the stream function.…”
Section: Modeling Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%