2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-015-0089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of arch changes on dental casts

Abstract: BackgroundAim of this retrospective observational study was to compare upper and lower dental changes in patients treated with Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) and Mixed Maxillary Expansion (MME), assessed by dental cast analysis.MethodsTreatment groups consisted of 42 patients: the RME group (n = 21) consisted of 13 female and 8 male subjects with the mean age of 8.8 years ± 1.37 at T0 and 9.6 years ± 1.45 at T1; the MME group (n = 21) consisted of 12 female and 9 male patients with a mean age of 8.9 years ± 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements recorded in the present study were demonstrated to be reliable by the small error of the method, and the use of photographs or scanned images for this kind of measurement was already validated by other authors ( 26 , 33 , 34 ). The main limitation of the present study was its retrospective design, but care was taken during the case selection process by rigidly following a time interval criterion to select only consecutive cases, thus reducing the risk of selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The measurements recorded in the present study were demonstrated to be reliable by the small error of the method, and the use of photographs or scanned images for this kind of measurement was already validated by other authors ( 26 , 33 , 34 ). The main limitation of the present study was its retrospective design, but care was taken during the case selection process by rigidly following a time interval criterion to select only consecutive cases, thus reducing the risk of selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Individuals with smaller maxillary basal bone, particularly in the anterior region, are at 22,23 as are compensations of the mandibular dentition following maxillary expansion. 24,25 These associations help to partially explain why expansion of maxillary basal bone alone, without any other conjunctive treatment, decreases mandibular crowding. 26 Importantly, maxillary apical base size explained 25% of individual differences in maxillary crowding and only 10% of the variation in mandibular crowding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RME has many effects on the nasomaxillary complex other than transverse maxillary expansion and correction of crossbites. Effects of RME were studied on skeletal transverse, vertical and anteroposterior position of the nasomaxillary structures [84], [85], maxillary and mandibular transverse arch dimensions [86], [87], upper airway dimensions [88], [89], bite force, changes in the masticatory cycle and occlusal force distribution [90], swallowing [25] and condylar response [91], [92], [93], changes in head posture and scapular position, natural head position [94], enamel demineralization and white spot lesion formation [23], [57], hearing loss [95], [96], nocturnal enuresis [21], [97], [98], eruption of 3 rd molars [55], Class ll div1 [99], speech and voice function [58], [100], [101], obstructive sleep apnea(102), tongue posture [103] and Holdaway soft tissue analysis [104]. Effects of RME have also been studied on basal bone changes even in the absence of crossbites [105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%