Advances in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 10 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9297-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Fractionated Radiation for the Treatment of Brain Metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We know that patients with multiple metastases may have a survival of 7 to 13 months with radiosurgery alone [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Limiting factors of efficacy after radiosurgical treatment are a volume of metastases above 3 cm 3 and doses lower than 18 Gy to the PTV, which are often applied due to high volume metastases [23,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We know that patients with multiple metastases may have a survival of 7 to 13 months with radiosurgery alone [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Limiting factors of efficacy after radiosurgical treatment are a volume of metastases above 3 cm 3 and doses lower than 18 Gy to the PTV, which are often applied due to high volume metastases [23,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study revealed a median survival time of 16 months which is comparable to the radiosurgery data. Table 4 summarizes all data on hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases [2,6,17,20,26]. In most of the studies, exact response rates for complete and partial response are not mentioned separately and actually, patient numbers treated by hypofractionated schemes for brain metastases are not comparably large to radiosurgery data yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many have proposed that larger radiation dose per fraction may confer improved therapeutic efficacy [21,22], clinical data substantiating these proposals remain elusive. A review of the literature suggests that clinical data for HSRS remain limited in the treatment of cerebral metastases [23][24][25][26][27][28]. In this context, we reviewed our institutional experience of HSRS in patients with cerebral metastases.…”
Section: Rationale For Hsrsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite these theoretical considerations, clinical data on the efficacy and toxicity profiles of HSRS remained limited. For cerebral lesions, cumulative doses ranging from 1800 to 3500 cGy delivered in three to five fractions have been reported for the treatment of both benign and malignant tumors [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Here we review our experience with HSRS in the treatment of cerebral metastases with regard to fractionation schedule, efficacy, and toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a significant increase of neuroradiologic changes and clinical side effects occurs, if > 10 cm 3 of normal brain are treated with > 10-12 Gy [14,27,28]. Recently, several clinical trials have shown the benefit of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hfSRT) as an alternative to SRS for higher-volume targets applying lower doses to normal tissue and profiting from fractionation effects [1,2,4,5,7,15,17,26]. Nevertheless, histopathologic effects of hfSRT on healthy brain tissue have not yet been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%