1988
DOI: 10.1029/pa003i006p00647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between radiocarbon ages obtained on coexisting planktonic foraminifera

Abstract: As a test of the reliability of paleocean ventilation rates reconstructed from radiocarbon age differences between planktonic and benthic foraminifera, measurements have been made on coexisting species of planktonic foraminifera. While ideally no differences should exist, we do find them. In this paper we discuss the possible causes for these differences and attempt to evaluate their impact on the interpretation of benthic‐planktonic age differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Cores 17961-2 and 17964-2=3 (supplemented by VEMA core 35-5; Broecker et al, 1988, andDuplessy et al, 1991) are from the tropical southwesternmost SCS, in front of the mouth of the former 'Molengraaff' River which debouched from the Sunda shelf during times when it was dried up along with glacial low sea level (Molengraaff, 1921;Fig. 1).…”
Section: Selection Of Core Transects and Sediment Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Cores 17961-2 and 17964-2=3 (supplemented by VEMA core 35-5; Broecker et al, 1988, andDuplessy et al, 1991) are from the tropical southwesternmost SCS, in front of the mouth of the former 'Molengraaff' River which debouched from the Sunda shelf during times when it was dried up along with glacial low sea level (Molengraaff, 1921;Fig. 1).…”
Section: Selection Of Core Transects and Sediment Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a detailed and AMS-14 C-dated stratigraphy for the last glacial cycle, we particularly focus on the short-term, i.e. decadal to centennial, changes in monsoonal climate and trace their timing, phase relationship, and linkages in general to global climate changes such as Heinrich and=or Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-Oe) events defined in the North Atlantic realm (Bond et al, 1992(Bond et al, , 1997Cortijo et al, 1995) and the associated changes in the global thermohaline circulation (Broecker et al, 1988;Sarnthein et al, 1994b;Seidov et al, 1996). Similar teleconnections were recently found and=or postulated by Kennett and Ingram (1995) and Kotilainen and Shackleton (1995) by studying paleoclimatic sediment records from the eastern and northwestern Pacific margins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data show problems other than bioturbation in using foraminifera as a dating material. Reports appear in the literature of age inversions, high core-top ages (Jones et al 1989) and deviating 14C ages for sample pairs of different (planktonic) foraminiferal species (Broecker et al 1988(Broecker et al , 1989Bard et al 1989;Jones et al 1989). It seems that the reliability of foraminifera as a dating tool in establishing sediment chronologies has not been tested as thoroughly as "traditional" dating samples, such as mollusk shells and wood-often due to the absence of such reference material for cross-checking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broecker et al 1988a). In this case, a systematic mean age difference of 890 yr was observed between Gs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…This finding was interpreted to reflect preferential dissolution of the dissolution-susceptible species Gs. sacculifera (Broecker et al 1988a). In part because a nearby core yielded a much smaller offset of 190 yr, the possibility of reworked older P. obliquiloculata was considered (Broecker et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%